this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023

245 points (96.2% liked)

science

14878 readers

85 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

245

Japan sets new nuclear fusion record (bigthink.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Salamendacious to c/science

83 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A massive nuclear fusion experiment just hit a major milestone, potentially putting us a little closer to a future of limitless clean energy.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] rockSlayer 78 points 1 year ago (6 children)

If we could harness the heat from nuclear fusion here on Earth, we could use it to generate electricity on-demand without worrying about carbon emissions, nuclear waste, or running out of fuel

I don't want to detract from this exciting milestone. Fusion is an absolute requirement for the complete end of our reliance on fossil fuels and there are no problems significant enough to warrant the end to fusion experiments. However, this statement is definitely not true with tokamak reactors. They typically use deuterium and tritium for fuel, which are limited resources. Fusion reactions are far more difficult with other light elemental isotopes. These reactors also use beryllium as shielding, which is a carcinogen. When the shielding needs to be replaced, it actually is radioactive.

[–] Decoy321 78 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those are entirely accurate facts, but those downsides are absolutely dwarfed by the upsides to the technology's potential. It's like getting your own spaceship, then pointing out that it lacks cup holders.

[–] rockSlayer 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I agree, fusion reactors will absolutely revolutionize everything, and even if we can't do better than tokamak reactors, these problems are still pretty mild. I just expect more from scientific journalism

[–] woefkardoes 14 points 1 year ago

Fusion is a very long term goal and I'm sure they are careful to not tarnish its image. But yes sadly the first commercial fusion reactors probably won't be sustainable but once they are a reality investment into the technology will be much greater and hopefully cleaner fuels will become a reality.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I remember about 15 years ago I did a school report on fusion power. I remember there was another model than the tokamak that was more complex to set up but had other advantages going for it. Think it was called the stellaradiator or something. Has it been a developmental dead end?

[–] A_A 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stellarator
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellarator

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ah yeah that’s the one. Thanks

[–] RubberElectrons 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

has it been a developmental dead end?

Nope, there are several companies & universities working on it.

W7x is the latest stellarator to come online, but there's a new Princeton University startup called Thea doing all the complex geometry and control problems of a stellarator in software.

It's a neat and elegant idea, engineering-wise. And no matter whose strategy works out, we all win in terms of understanding plasma physics, and possibly unlocking the secrets of the universe.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it may be that the author knew that if that was included their work would be used by your ben shapiro types to proclaim that fusion reactors create substances that are both carcinogenic AND radioactive!!!! and can site their article. not saying thats the case, but I could understand such reasoning

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Salamendacious 11 points 1 year ago

I really appreciate this. It's important to be aware of all the facts

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Deuterium is pretty common, and tritium can be produced by lithium irradiation. They are finite resources, but still much larger than pretty much any existing resource.

It is true that fusion equipment suffers from neutron radiation, however this is a potential for breeding tritium.

[–] rockSlayer 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Like I said elsewhere, the problems I pointed out are relatively mild in comparison to all the good from fusion energy. However, there's only approximately 25kg of tritium in the entire world. ITER is expected to use a majority of this world-wide supply. The mass manufacturing of tritium also presents another problem you pointed out with the supply: a super rare isotope needs rare earth metals to manufacture, one that is already in extremely high demand. I love this research and I want to succeed in any way possible. But we have to face reality and the material problems the science has to overcome.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] A_A 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's new ? this :

Stepping stone: At 52 feet tall, the JT-60SA is now the biggest tokamak to reach first plasma anywhere in the world — but it likely won’t be for long.

[–] willis936 6 points 1 year ago

I'd be surprised if they don't start setting performance records soon. First plasma was a few weeks ago.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tony Stark was able to build this in a cave!

[–] Something_Complex 5 points 1 year ago

Well I'm sorry. I'm not Tonny Stark

[–] RampantParanoia2365 3 points 1 year ago

I've read the article and I'm still not clear what the breakthrough is.

load more comments