this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
157 points (91.1% liked)

Games

32696 readers
1562 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

While Blizzard is very much focussed on its big money-makers like its various Warcraft games, from WoW to Hearthstone to Warcraft Rumble, as well as Diablo and the much-maligned Overwatch 2, he's still open to StarCraft making a comeback. That said, RTS fans shouldn't get their hopes up. While the series might return, that doesn't necessarily mean it will be an RTS, and whatever shape it takes will depend on the person or team who goes to bat for it.

"It's not me saying, 'Go make a StarCraft game,'" Ybarra told Bloomberg. "I need to have someone who has the vision and passion that comes with the idea, and I'll bet on that team."

A vision and passion he - according to his own words - clearly does not have. πŸ˜‘

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] loo 124 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

The good days of Blizzard are over, I'm not getting my hopes up for anything they produce nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'll keep an ear to the ground.

But I don't like that $90 preorder logic at all, it's almost weird it exists.

I try to imagine going to a gamestop and a gaming associate was like, buy that game 3 days later and I'll give you $20.

Skip the in game pet and mount, that most people forget exists after the expansion, and I'll make that $40

But then.... why does this system exist?!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Early access is the new fad, because it costs nothing and has value to some players. The increasing drive for more monetization is Activision's influence, Blizzard was really lazy about it before being bought.

At least early access makes a little sense in an mmo. The new areas are super crowded on launch, so letting some get through early does help.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

But then… why does this system exist?!

Because it works and makes them money! You can bet that other publishers will take notice and you'll see such money grabbing schemes becoming more and more common.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago (17 children)

that doesn't necessarily mean it will be an RTS, and whatever shape it takes will depend on the person or team who goes to bat for it.

So... it's not Starcraft, then. It's just another game.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver 25 points 1 year ago

You know how in Starcraft, Infestors could take over a unit and parade it around to do its bidding?

It sounds kind of like that, but with the Starcraft brand.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So… it’s not Starcraft, then.

I think Starcraft has enough story and character development by now that its identity is more than just the mechanics that it started with.

It’s just another game.

It would still be a Starcraft game. If we were to ignore the lore and only consider the RTS format, then even the first Starcraft was "just another game". Those mechanics weren't unique or new.

Similarly, World of Warcraft is still a Warcraft game, even though it's hung on a different framework from the original.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think Starcraft has enough story and character development by now that its identity is more than just the mechanics that it started with.

I can imagine that, but I don't think anyone but RTS fans know that.
I feel like, if they want to 'bring it back' as a brand, they would need to do an RTS game with all the marketing and such, to please the fans and bring it back into the public's memory, and then they could follow it up with a non-RTS spinoff.

If they don't do it like this, they'll likely have another debacle like with Diablo Immortals, where fans are waiting for a full-fledged title in that series and they're announcing something that's just not that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheEighthDoctor 9 points 1 year ago

The name is moneygrab

[–] c0mbatbag3l 7 points 1 year ago

StarCraft extraction shooter confirmed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

StarCraft Pinball! I can't wait.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Would you claim if Starcrft ghost had not been canceled, it would not be a starcrft game?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] psycho_driver 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blizzard died a long time ago.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, let's not forget that Blizzard was bought by Activision and Activision was just bought by Microsoft.

There is no "Blizzard", just Microsoft.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I genuinely have more faith in Microsoft than Activision.

I don't have any empirical evidence, but for some reason I do.

[–] BustinJiber 51 points 1 year ago

"Ohoho Kerrigan got herself in a big pickle, could you help her collect all these fruit?"

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

StarCraft Ghost back on the menu?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Yeah it's been awhile, old penny arcade about it been almost 20 years. I remember hoping to see it at the time.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

The next Starcraft game will be a MOBA BR because that's the most soulless thing we could think of and it's our best bet to boost shareholder confidence.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's going to be a mobile game.

[–] caveman8000 12 points 1 year ago

What, you don't have a phone?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I hope StarCraft: Ghost finally gets made. IIRC, it was supposed to be a 3rd person shooter.

[–] AustralianSimon 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was made then they shelved it

[–] badaboomxx 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A build was leaked, it wasn't complete but according to the reports it had like 2 complete worlds.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

"The lights mean stealth!"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bigbadmoose 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

My thought exactly!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Beat me to it. I'd put money on them completing this (or a bastardization of what it was supposed to be).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hahattpro 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do we have StarCraft on mobile. Maybe StarCraft Immortal something?

[–] jj4211 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Do you guys not have phones?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Mobile gacha / 10

[–] BURN 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is there any point to StarCraft if it’s not an RTS?

[–] Alexstarfire 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Idk, I always thought Starcraft: Ghost sounded promising. Actually being able to participate in one of the battles seemed pretty cool to me. Of course, the devil is usually in the details.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] piecat 5 points 1 year ago

World of StarCraft? /s

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why do I feel like this is gonna just be M$/Activi$ion/Blizzard going, "Hey look at Starfield, we have a sci-fi thing, let's copy Starfield with our sci-fi IP".

[–] Carighan 6 points 1 year ago

And I mean, while I can't see a Starfield-clone work in the Starcraft universe, I could see an adjacent spin-off game work really well like being a cargo-pilot having to drop stuff off on planets during active battles with fire all around you, or an exploration game where you explore galaxies and have to avoid being detected/caught by the zerg and/or protoss.

But I can't see the modern Actiblizzking pull that off, even with MS throwing endless money at them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tronn4 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Sounds like under Microsoft it's going to be a first person shooter :rolls eyes:

[–] kogs 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To be fair, I reckon a well made SC FPS could be pretty rad if you got to play each species/unit type. Playing as a Zealot or Dark Templar would be awesome.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd love for Blizzard to pursue a genuine passion project. Ask the Microsoft overlords for a few years to put out something not beholden to sales expectations or profit. They can devote a small team to make something that they want to while the rest of the company continues on with its soulless corporate entertainment fabricator to fund the creative projects. You need creative projects to keep the workforce engaged.

If nothing else, Activision Blizzard was seen as a greedy, profit-driven machine which continually pushed out semi-entertaining products with en emphasis on FOMO micro-transactions and monetization schemes. Blizzard is a shell of what it once was.

Let them get back to their roots. Let them focus on engagement and fun.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

how about make a new fucking game?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mediocre_Bard 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some time back there was an April Fool's Day release for World of Starcraft. I assume they didn't make it because they had maxed out their bank accounts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Do yOu GUys not hAve phoNes??

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

We can only pray they won't. It won't be good.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί