this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
87 points (86.6% liked)

politics

19101 readers
3698 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We have fostered an environment in which a man who has apparently committed no crimes nor harmed anyone is shamed into ending his life.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JustZ 78 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"We have fostered"?

Not we, Republicans, including Copeland. Dude was a coward and hypocrite. He may have been many other things including loving husband and father.

You cannot work for a colation of people who make queer people feel safer being in the closet and then get all shocked when your coalition outs you.

I don't think he should have been outed for being queer. I think he should have been outed for being queer, while most hypocritically supporting anti-queer policy and rhetoric. Dude didn't need to go into politics. Didnt need to be a Republican.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

We

Okay this author can fuck right off with this 'we' garbage. Republicans did this. If you're too chicken shit to be specific with your pontificating then you're just a worthless pearl clutching asshole.

Edit: lol at these morons assuming I must be unaware that ALreporter is an Alabama news source and that it somehow should serve to invalidate anything I've said. This editorial is garbage. It's not the fault of Alabamians, it's the fault of Alabama Republicans and by extension the national party. Anything short of assigning blame where it belongs, squarely at the feet of the Republican party, is a blatant lie and a transparent attempt to spread blame onto those who bear no responsibility for this tragedy whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It’s an Alabama focused news site. The we can apply to either Alabamans, media outlets, or both. So that’s the we, and likely one you’re not a part of.

If you are in that we, it sucks, but if you’re going to be part of a whole with your neighbors, you’re going to have to own the consequences of their ideas sometimes. Maintaining a separation from them might make you feel morally superior, but it’s not going to do anything to negate those consequences or prevent future ones.

Separating is a powerful act, but it should be a rare one.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wow, this article sucks. Trying reeeal hard to blame people for investigating, and not for being bigots in the first place. Also conveniently ignoring this guy's public stance on those same bigots.

[–] macarthur_park 19 points 1 year ago

I didn’t read it that way. The op ed spends most of the text criticizing christian, anti-LGBTQ legislation. He blames the bigots.

”… instead of heaping buckets of condemnation on a man for a victimless alternate lifestyle that you happen to find icky. But, boy, we’re good at that around here, aren’t we?”

“From trying to remove LGBTQ+ books from libraries to essentially banning transgender kids from existence to forcing children to have children, the state of Alabama, under conservative rule, has cornered the market on religious governance.”

”Yet, we continue to push these distorted Christian beliefs as actual policy and law. And in the process, we have fostered an environment in which a man who has apparently committed no crimes or harmed anyone is shamed into ending his own life.”

”There is no telling how many Bubba Copelands there are out there – kids and adults who have been crushed by the hateful, ill-informed, religious-based environment fostered by this sort of ignorance and intolerance. People who have been used as pawns by politicians to spread ignorance and fear.”

There’s a lot more in the article, but I don’t want to quote too much and run afoul of site rules.

[–] Kbobabob 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought i read that he didn't really have a public stance other than just an "R".

[–] ChicoSuave 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not pick D and be welcomed? Why side with the people who clearly hate him enough to pressure him to die.

[–] AbidanYre 12 points 1 year ago

Because Alabama isn't going to elect a Democrat.

[–] alquicksilver 6 points 1 year ago

It's an opinion piece, not a news article. They're usually something like this.

[–] cabron_offsets 28 points 1 year ago

Fuck outta here. The republicunts own this.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

The lesson should be that these Christian nationalists are coming for everyone. You don't get a pass for being a "good one" if you deviate from their standards.

Their sexual standards are everything except sex between married couples for procreation is wrong. The sodomy laws included making oral sex between heterosexually married couples illegal. They aren't just coming for trans people they are coming for them first. The rest of us are coming next.

[–] PP_BOY_ 14 points 1 year ago

If you need a "lesson" to not call real children sluts or whores and write stories about those children being given forced gender surgery and sold into sex slavery on public accounts with your face attached, you should probably kill yourself too

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lol, nope, Republicans fuck off, we're intolerant to intolerance in this household

Poor poor racist Republican, joined the Republican party to hold down women, and minorities, didn't wanna get into the whole "the leopards that eat faces party, that i glad fully joined and represented. might eat my face, should they find out i like wearing women's clothing, here, let me just defund another domestic violence shelter, nope, i'll be just fine"

All Republicans are hypocritical bigots, by definition. It's the core of their political party, it's who they signed up to be identified with, it's who they are, or in the case of this poor bigoted fuck, were. I don't want to see any "but this was a nice republican" bullshit. After the Southern Strategy in 1964, all Republicans are trash, every single one.

Institutionalized racism, misogyny, homophobia, and white Christian separatism as party platform. No matter how "conservative" Republicans claimed to be, The Southern Strategy was the core value and singular driving force for the past 60 years.

MAGA isn't a symptom, it's result.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Agree with the thoughts on Republican party in generally. But let's be sure that it's morally wrong to out people, even if they have betrayed the social contract on tolerance.

we're intolerant to intolerance in this household

That means you don't tolerate people's intolerance. It doesn't mean you go scorched earth and use their own hateful tactics against them.

In this case, it was his own party and/or "side" that outed him. But it was still wrong regardless of who did it and no one should encourage that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm pretty done with the suggestion of suicide across the board.

Fucking stay with us; witness this shit; and help us fix this mess.

[–] Chainweasel 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)