this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
71 points (93.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35260 readers
1777 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I see people say that NordVPN is a bad choice all the time, but I've never seen any credible evidence that they're not trustworthy. Can anyone provide any sources with valid reasons to avoid their service? I only know that they had some servers hacked in 2018, but it seems as though they took that very seriously and upgraded their hardware and encryption accordingly. I'm just trying to decide if I want to start looking at alternatives, but honestly I'm pretty satisfied with my experience so far.

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheFogan 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally my biggest distrust of nord comes from their ads. Most notably one where they anthromorphized a guys smart TV, Roomba and phone talking about him when he leaves the room, and others that basically totally misrepresent what a vpn does.

In short, your TV, Phone, etc... most likely share and compile information because of the ACCOUNTS they need to function. using a VPN will do NOTHING to stop google from knowing any android data, Your devices don't hear eachother by listening to the network, which is almost all going to be encrypted protocols anyway, but by sharing accounts.

In short, I've always found nords comercials constantly misleading on what a VPN can and can't protect you from, and to me it seems that's largely so they can market them to people who don't actually have any use for them, and worse doing it to make people feel like they are "protecting themselves" from something that they are just as vulnerable to with the vpn.

[–] drmoose 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

AFAIK those commercials are made by the content creators themselves and Nord just gives them a guidelines doc, right?

It's true that VPN doesn't do much tho it definitely used to help with IP-based tracking. Imagine if we all pooled our connections through 1 Lemmy IP then the tracker will be very confused why this one IP is coming to many different sources. It doesn't work as much anymore because now 99% of tracking is done through javascript and it's a long lost battle already.

[–] NEOpera 10 points 1 year ago

NORD have to sign off on them, they are responsible for their image. It's still on them.

[–] TheFogan 1 points 1 year ago

One that was coming to my mind was this one https://www.ispot.tv/ad/IU7h/nordvpn-terrible-at-secrets

which, everything I can see was actually an ad created by nord themselves.

Yeah I get the youtube promo spots say where a youtube creator slips a promo in, and they get lots of leeway and aren't heavily focused on. But many of them are put out by nords marketing team directly. Who either doesn't understand their own product, or is trying to mislead.

[–] ohmyiv 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use a different VPN, but honestly, I wouldn't use Nord only because of their ads and sponsorships. It's kind of a lame excuse, but they wore me out with that.

[–] Labotomized 31 points 1 year ago

Anything that’s so heavily advertised is a big red flag to me. To me it feels like they’re spending more on advertising than making a decent product and hoping people buy it instead of letting the product speak for itself. But that’s not necessarily only about Nord…

[–] alokir 19 points 1 year ago

I don't know why others don't like them but I personally dislike them and Express because of false advertising.

They make it seem like a vpn protects you from everything online, from hackers, phishing attacks, viruses etc and provides absolute privacy no matter what. This is not what a vpn does.

I also wonder how they can get away with marketing themselves as a way to get around geoblocking. I don't personally mind this part but I assume it's a legal gray area for them so they do it until they can get away with it.

[–] Linker95 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wasn’t NordVPN that provider that said they were no log and then a hack happened and exposed that they did, in fact, retain logs of user activity? Am I mixing them up with someone else?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's happened with almost every VPN provider that has claimed to be no-log and then got a government subpoena. At that point you have 2 options: A.) Shut down, or B.) Code a technical way to capture the requested information for that user.

Sometimes they do choose to shut down and sometimes there isn't a technically feasible way to get the information.

[–] Linker95 2 points 1 year ago

Did that happen to Proton or Mullvad?

[–] slugworth 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the reason you stated is probably the main reason for most of the hate. I’ve been a Nord user for years and have no complaints. However, I am currently considering switching to Firefox VPN because I want to financially support Firefox development and that’s one of the best ways to do it.

[–] Miqo 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that's the worst of it, then I guess I don't have anything to worry about. Thank you!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I believe they keep history logs that can be subpoenaed and tied to you as evidence. I also believe that is true of most of the heavily advertised services. Check out PIA

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't the Firefox VPN just a rebrand of Mullvad or something? Like they just use their servers and put in their logo?

I have been using PIA for the last few years and I am personally pretty happy. I had some issues with Nord connect and speed a few years back. PIA on wireguard has worked great for me. I have a gigabit connection and although I can't hit that with pia, my Unraid SabNZB hits over 70MB/s easy which is great

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

PIA can be a little slow, but the big difference (and reason I use it) is that they don't keep any logs. A VPN provider gets a subpoena and they will turn over the history of what you did under there service. To my knowledge PIA is one of the few (like 2-3 I thought) that keeps no records and couldn't cooperate if they wanted to. I'm like 7 years deep with them and they still roll out new features and servers all the time. I consider them a pillar of what a VPN should be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not saying we should trust it or anything but NordVPN does have a "no-logs" policy.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

None of the other answers I'm seeing are the actual reasons you shouldn't trust more specifically. The reason you shouldn't trust them is because a few years ago they had a data breach. It was relatively small and wouldn't have effected many if any people but the problem was they didn't disclose it and tried to bury it. It wasn't found out about until a few years later. That should tell you if they had a major data breach that did affect you they would try to hide that from you and you would never know unless a you were made aware through other means.

Source: https://www.techradar.com/news/whats-the-truth-about-the-nordvpn-breach-heres-what-we-now-know

[–] Chobbes 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, all of these VPN companies deserve a lot of hate for having some pretty deceptive advertising and fearmongering. VPNs definitely have their uses, but the average person probably doesn't need one... Especially not for "security" purposes.

[–] vsg 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also, how often do you want to watch a Netflix movie/show that is not available in your country?

[–] Chobbes 8 points 1 year ago

This is the thing I don’t mind VPN companies advertising about, because yeah, they can work to get around region restrictions, and that’s a totally valid use for them that some people will appreciate. If you have a specific use case like this, by all means pay for a VPN… But if you’re just using it as a magic internet condom… I don’t think it’s worth your money.

In general the claims about security at a coffee shop or whatever are kind of bunk, and any privacy benefits are kind of overstated (especially if you don’t think you have a reason to trust the VPN provider more than your ISP). There isn’t a complete lack of truth to these claims, but I don’t think they’re true in a way that’s meaningful to the average person who isn’t tech savvy, and I think there’s often a lack of transparency about certain aspects such as the fact that technically the VPN provider can log everything anybody else would, and you have no way of knowing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

American living in Japan: a lot (though other services, not Netflix). Even before moving to Japan, certain BBC content, etc.

[–] heliumlake 9 points 1 year ago

Most VPN services are a sham. They just hide your network activity from your ISP, however they have full visibility in to your network traffic. Some of these VPN providers are even owned by ad agencies, but advertise privacy as a selling point. You’re better off running your own WireGuard or OpenVPN server at home or with a VPS. At least you will have control over the server and limit your exposure to unscrupulous VPN companies. (Yes using a VPS is shifting the trust from one to the other, but you will have to make a decision that is right for you.)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

They store your IP, and they use it. I think that sums all up. The point of vpn is to be private, and if you’re giving up your IP to a third party, you’ve done nothing with the vpn.

[–] satanmat 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. I’ve not had any issues

So. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

You appear to be missing an arm. Here, take this one instead: \

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My general philosophy is that anything advertised on YouTube or podcasts is automatically a scam. So I'd avoid NordVPN in favor of literally any other service just on principle. Outside of that, though all I've heard is the same general grumblings about price and deceptive advertising.

[–] MajorHavoc 1 points 1 year ago

Yep. Must have ripped someone off, or cut a lot of corners, to be able to afford that ad.

It's held true pretty well so far, for me.

[–] GustavoM 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In a nutshell -- it transforms your PC/phone into a honeypot for third parties.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Miqo 1 points 1 year ago

This was very informative, thank you!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

No issues personally with NordVPN but they have made me some cash by causing some people I provide tech support for to be unable to access their wifi connected printer until I disabled the lan blocking feature.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] Gingerlegs 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I had it for a few years, not a single problem.

Ever since iOS 16, it’s a nightmare. It’s been almost a year. I’ve tried proton’s free vpn, no issues. So I guess I’m going to buy theirs now.

I don’t think this is what you’re really referring to, but this has been my experience. Lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I can't find the document right now but NordVPN was always ranked very high on r/VPN. So I assume there is nothing wrong with using it and it's one of the few products where the money spent on marketing didn't influence the quality.

Or they also paid the person who maintained the ranking list.

[–] ghariksforge 1 points 1 year ago

I recommend Mullvad if you are looking for a decent VPN provider.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'll be honest I have no idea about the "ads" that others speak of, mainly because I don't ever see any ads for them (I had adblocker installed on everything AND I have a subscription to Nord VPN). I wouldn't say I'm biased though because if there was a good enough reason to switch, I'd have no problem doing so, so I can tell you that at least so far, after having had a subscription for 2-3 years, I haven't really had much complaint with them. Occasionally there will be weird issues where right after a downloaded update, for some reason it has a hard time connecting, but it doesn't usually last very long and those kind of things are always one-offs.

I do like that it also has both an Onion over VPN and P2P function. I haven't used the onion one yet because I rarely ever use Tor (and I'm not sure, based on my limited understanding of Tor/Onion routing, whether VPN does anything anyway as from what I can tell/read at best it doesn't really provide any additional security and at worst it may in fact create a backdoor way for tracking). I do occasionally use the P2P for torrenting though and haven't had any issues there either (and no "C&D notices" from any companies).

But again, I'm perfectly open to using other programs, but for now I just haven't had any issues with it personally so if you were looking for an opinion from someone who uses it, there you go.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As others have said, my biggest problem with NordVPN is the dishonest ads. Other big commercial VPN providers are guilty of it, too. A VPN provides very little in the way of security. Tom Scott has a pretty good break down of the problem with VPN ads.

I also object to their pricing. They push you to commit to a 1-2 year contract. If you have a good reason to use a VPN often (like bypassing geographic restrictions) then maybe it makes sense. For me, I rarely need it. If I do want to use a VPN, I can get 30 days with Mullvad for 5 euro without signing up for a year+ commitment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

ProtonVPN, one of the most recommended VPNs that I can find, also pushes you toward a 1-2 year contract. Mullvad is probably the only one that doesn't (and they just removed port forwarding).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm using it right now, I didn't know there was hate towards them. I needed a VPN, and when I was reading recent reviews, Nord seemed like the way to go for my needs. I hope I haven't made a mistake, but after a few months now it seems fine? Fast enough for sure.

[–] tallwookie 0 points 1 year ago

dunno, I used it for a while and then stopped. it worked ok, no real complaints.

load more comments
view more: next ›