TheFogan

joined 1 year ago
[–] TheFogan 6 points 6 months ago

Not to mention, it's really hard to pass time.

[–] TheFogan 2 points 10 months ago

Point is, a hash isn't a password. giving the most you don't need tech knowledge analogy, it's like the passwords fingerprint.

The police station may keep your daughters fingerprint so that if they find a lost child they can recognize it is your daughter beyond any doubt. Your daughters fingerprints, is like a hash, your daughter is a password.

The police should not store your daughter... that's bad practice. The fingerprints are all they should store, and needless to say the fingerprints aren't your daughter, just as a hash isn't a password.

[–] TheFogan 3 points 1 year ago

The any publicity is good publicity mindset really is gone after you are already a household name. Twitter was already in the news daily, Journalism was replaced with 300 "Celebrity/politician tweeted ______", and half the time all research and studies being replaced with 10 random tweets. "People are outraged about X, here's 10 tweets from random people to prove it".

[–] TheFogan 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean short and long term there's pros and cons to that. however there's a reason why that started to fall appart with e-mail. In short if it gets popular, than hosting servers with no throttling or post limits means spammers are going to go crazy, and rather than play the never ending unwinnable whack a mole game as bad actors create thousands of instances a day, hosts of any instances worth targetting will have to do a "instances are assumed malicious until proven benign", (IE a whitelist method)

[–] TheFogan 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly it's a really old meme, the early form of the joke had soundcloud added, and the punch line was a small dog with headphones in.

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/these-companies-test-on-animals

[–] TheFogan 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think it's the existance of big providers, as much as the general problem of spam, lemmy will likely have this too one day if it grows big, with or without big corporate backed lemmy's. Fact is, it's trivial to set up an e-mail server, and have it send millions of spam messages a day to thousands of addresses. You can then register dozens of domain names for a few dollars, and fill the internet with millions of spam messages.

Which is why pretty much all e-mail servers default anything that isn't known to be throttled (IE a gmail account won't let you just send as many messages as your bandwidth can handle). A black list whack a mole is basically an unwinnable battle on that front, all anti-spam measures kind of have to start with a "prove you aren't a spammer then we'll whitelist you", rather than the opposite.

But the main point still remains, there are dozens of e-mail providers that have proven they aren't spam, and more or less ones that meet every overall goal one might have. Ones that don't track you or put ads (some you may have to pay for, but that's the options). Still 100x healthier than say facebook and twitter where you consent to all their tracking and rules, or you can't talk to their members ever.

[–] TheFogan 37 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Yeah on the whole it could be good, In the same way that it isn't a problem that google owns the most popular e-mail service, that doesn't hurt those on proton mail or any other mail service, and in fact offers benefits that they can just as easilly e-mail their friends using gmail from their preffered mail service. The real fear is the embrace extend extinguish. IE if meta encourages people to join their instance, then gradually makes things incompatible after major communities move to them, but they can't prevent us from moving back just the same even if they somehow got us to jump there.

[–] TheFogan 6 points 1 year ago

Well that's also where fediverse is a perk. There are, and likely will always be parallel channels on different instances. IE so while lemmy.ml may have the largest asklemmy, there probably will be smaller less active asklemmy's on other instances.

[–] TheFogan 2 points 1 year ago

undefined> As for the premise that they were trying to demonstrate how harmful AI can be… sorry but that’s bullshit. It’s trivial to create “compromising” images of anyone without using AI.

Well depends what you mean by "trivial", and how good you are talking. I mean in 15 seconds I can take a random screengrab from a porn, and paste Biden and Desantis's heads over the bodies. but I wouldn't imagine fooling anyone with it.

The actual danger of AI is, it's getting closer and closer to doing the kinds of images that a professional digital artist would take several hours to accomplish, in seconds/minutes.

[–] TheFogan 1 points 1 year ago

One that was coming to my mind was this one https://www.ispot.tv/ad/IU7h/nordvpn-terrible-at-secrets

which, everything I can see was actually an ad created by nord themselves.

Yeah I get the youtube promo spots say where a youtube creator slips a promo in, and they get lots of leeway and aren't heavily focused on. But many of them are put out by nords marketing team directly. Who either doesn't understand their own product, or is trying to mislead.

[–] TheFogan 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Personally my biggest distrust of nord comes from their ads. Most notably one where they anthromorphized a guys smart TV, Roomba and phone talking about him when he leaves the room, and others that basically totally misrepresent what a vpn does.

In short, your TV, Phone, etc... most likely share and compile information because of the ACCOUNTS they need to function. using a VPN will do NOTHING to stop google from knowing any android data, Your devices don't hear eachother by listening to the network, which is almost all going to be encrypted protocols anyway, but by sharing accounts.

In short, I've always found nords comercials constantly misleading on what a VPN can and can't protect you from, and to me it seems that's largely so they can market them to people who don't actually have any use for them, and worse doing it to make people feel like they are "protecting themselves" from something that they are just as vulnerable to with the vpn.

[–] TheFogan 1 points 1 year ago

Same logic I could say my ex girlfriend who watched every season of house correctly diagnosed a 1 in a million case. As you said in short, in medical school there's an old saying "when you hear hoofbeats think horses not zebras". If you are likely to catch the 1 in a million, how many of the 999,999 with common ailments are you likely to accidentally diagnose with something crazy.

view more: next ›