this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
253 points (95.0% liked)

politics

19153 readers
2696 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Let me add that is the weirdest place to put an em dash in a headline I've ever seen.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago

This isn't a case about mocking a former president, it's about trying to trademark mocking a former president, which can then be used to sue other people who use the phrase. You don't need a trademark to print shirts with disparaging words against Trump, you need it to stop other people from doing it. The Biden administration isn't protecting Trump with this suit.

[–] Ryan213 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are we going to be sued every time we refer to his small penis as small?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If it's factual, it's not defamation.

Alternatively, I understand that it really MASSIVELY bothers him if you refer to his funny tiny microscopic hands.

[–] FuglyDuck 30 points 1 year ago

Those hands?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Not a defamation suit. This is about not being able to trademark "trump too small".

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Better switch to micro to be safe.

[–] RojoSanIchiban 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Orbituary 5 points 1 year ago
[–] PeterPoopshit 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A Supreme Court case over.. cleans glasses Trump's penis size..? We are living in a South Park episode. Good to see our tax dollars hard at work. As usual.

[–] kittenzrulz123 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

His dick is as small as his political Integrity

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So it’s just a smooth Ken-lump.

[–] IchNichtenLichten 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you think he likes being grabbed by his Ken-innie. Kinnie? Mini Kinnie?

[–] IchNichtenLichten 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FUPA? Kinda like his neck vulva.

I'm grossing myself out here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

neck vulva

I'm officially bringing back "I just threw up in my mouth a little" for this

[–] Piecemakers3Dprints 4 points 1 year ago

It's "Kenough"?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I don't know about that, several people have claimed that, while small, he does actually have a penis. Political integrity? Eh... not so much.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This reminds me of when the prosecutors questioned Epstein about his egg-shaped penis on the record

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ugh, now I have "egg shaped penis" in my Google search history. But that's ok. I'll take one for the team.

https://www.cracked.com/article_27886_jeffrey-epstein-had-egg-shaped-penis.html

[–] Piecemakers3Dprints 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a lot of repetition of Epstein's name and "egg-shaped penis". Like, a lot.

You're welcome.

[–] Piecemakers3Dprints 2 points 1 year ago

Epstein == egg peen. 💡

[–] PK2 3 points 1 year ago

The team thanks you! Best laugh I've had at this hour in years.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] cricket97 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

body shaming is ok as long as it's someone you don't like

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well it also has to be "short man," "small penis," "bald man," or "fat man." There are limited acceptible options.

[–] Maco1969 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The size of his manhood isn't about shaming him it's about proving the fact that he is a liar and a criminal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Pffft been proven. Don't need to make the small-dicked out there feel bad for a post trump'll never see though. Seems "ineffective."

[–] cricket97 2 points 1 year ago

it would be cool if you could just be honest. "Yes we are shaming him and we don't care" instead of pretending like you are exposing some important truth. makes you a coward

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

That will be an interesting Discovery

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

“twig and/or berries”

🤣

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I can put it in a weirder place

Claim About Trump’s ‘Small’ Genital Organ—Going All The Way To Supreme Court This Week

[–] Wilibus 5 points 1 year ago

Wow, that first amendment kinda sucks when people are talking about your tiny dick.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Is dick so small one term presidency was not enough to compensate for it he have to try for another one