this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
52 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35308 readers
1215 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 58 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Physical seasons, and the modern western calendar, are both based on the sun. Having two moons wouldn't make a difference there.

Two moons would make the ocean tides more complicated, though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Perhaps we’d have entirely solar-based calendars with four month-like divisions for the seasons, based on the angle of shadows cast by the Sun (I hear the Mayans had these huge dial things that just counted from 1 to 365) and leap days added onto one season every few years.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

You could simply ignore one moon for you calendar. 😄

[–] captainlezbian 3 points 10 months ago

Seasons could still probably be broken down further than that. A system of 8 solar months would make sense. Basically the times of lots of change in day length vs stable day length.

Also so long as one of the moons continued to roughly correlate to menstrual cycles it would probably have some cultures tell time by it

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Many indigenous peoples tell the time of year by the stars rather than the moon. A certain constellation just became visible? Must be X time of year!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Given our propensity to watch the stars and moon, I think we'd figure out some month schedule if we wanted one.

Months really don't matter all that much because the seasons are still based the Sun and the planets tilt. The days get shorter and longer each day and that's pretty easy to observe.

(We might actually get a month that makes more sense if we throw out lunar cycles. One that aligns with the week.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

True, it takes 28 days for the moon to orbit us and yet only one of our months is actually 28 days long (and even then it's 29 if the year's a multiple of 4). Every other month is either 30 or 31 days long.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

@Epicurus0319 solstice and equinox my dude.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Earth's moon is notably big. Relative to the size of its parent planet, it's easily the biggest* in the solar system (or second biggest if you Stan Pluto as a planet). If there was a second moon, it would likely be a lot smaller. So, I don't think it would have much practical effect on things like tides or timekeeping. It would still have cultural significance in things like mythology and astrology. If we could observe moon-moon interactions we might have discovered gravity earlier.

/* in absolute size, there are a couple of larger moons, but they're moons of giant planets so Luna still wins in relative size.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We'd have two Mondays. Nothing good can come of this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago
[–] IchNichtenLichten 3 points 10 months ago
[–] XeroxCool 3 points 10 months ago

Stars, the sun, and, if they change, seasons. The moon is a nice guide from month to month but it's not really used to keep track of time over a year. Usually there's 12 full moons, but sometimes it's 13. The stars have long been used as a time-keeping constant and the path of the sun too. With the Earth's axial tilt, everywhere on the planet sees variation in where the sun rises, peaks, and sets - even at the equator. The visible constellations vary through the year and are what we still use to measure Earth's position (and therefore the date).

The date is a position in orbit. The time is a direction you face. Our measure of time isn't arbitrary

[–] Smokeydope 1 points 10 months ago

Our fantasy world artist would make worlds with three moons instead of two. Who knows they might even think having one moon would be cool.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think that technically we have two 'moons' already. Just that the other one is super small and doesn't really have much effect on the planet.

Sorry that this didn't answer your question, and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

We only have one moon of any size that we know of - earth temporarily captures asteroids a lot, but they're not in a long-term stable orbit and so only orbit the earth for a few years before escaping

There's a good gif on this page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_CD3

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Thanks for the heads-up. It would appear I was wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I've heard people describe the asteroid Cruithne as earth's second moon (the chat show QI did a bit on it, and it's in a Steven Baxter novel). But I think that's kind of a misleading description - it orbits the sun not the earth, just in a way that regularly syncs up with the earth's orbit.