this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
138 points (90.1% liked)

News

23411 readers
2918 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeffw 75 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

The issue with institutionalization (besides SCOTUS ruling it violates the ADA in 1999’s Olmstead v LC, rendering it illegal for anyone with a disability), is that it’s expensive. That’s why Reagan defunded them all.

To be clear, deinstutionalization was a good idea, but unlike JFK’s push, Reagan pushed for it without replacing institutions with well-funded community services. Which would be cheaper than institutions, most of which sit unoccupied and decaying, so there’s also the question of where Trump wants to put these people.

[–] Candelestine 44 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This doesn't get said enough. Getting rid of them was a legitimately good idea, the some of the abuses in those places was hair-raising. We just didn't replace them with anything, so the mentally ill all just turned into homeless mentally ill, which just made more people miserable, which in turn probably contributes to more individual incidents of mental illness occuring.

[–] jeffw 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Many also ended up in jails and prisons

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And many more simply died. As it turns out, releasing the disabled onto the street, surprisingly, wasn’t a perfect option.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Canada did the same damn thing at the same damn time with the same damn repercussions because our PM followed Reagan around like a damn lapdog. 🤬

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Im in the disability field and honestly I feel like we need something and need it bad. Not institutions, at least not like they were, but I honestly wouldn't be surprised to see some people in the disability community respond positively to this with the hopes that its different this time, lord know the people who like him don't believe his words at face value. I can also tell you thers definitely is a not insignificant amount of people in the community who have a neutral to faborable feeling on Trump.

The key here I think is that during the pandemic, even before mask mandates, we started seeing services get cut, orgs defunded, and staff reduced. So much of the disability community right now is relying on support staff and self directed program funding, which is essentially the disbursement of medicare and medicaid funding to one individual, not necessary with a medical background, to help the person with the disability with their day to day stuff and goals stated in their Individual Service Plan. The flexibility is great but its just one person at a time, they don't even get a budget to do things typically.

A lot of people with disabilities are missing the structure of actual organizations that has the resources to do more than what a one on one support worker can, and someone on Trumps team is either smart enough to know that, or quite lucky.

[–] jeffw 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nice, I also used to work in the disability field (ID/A). And you’re right, although at least in my state we haven’t had cuts, more so just a lack of sufficient new funding.

I will say that I don’t think many in the disability will support this, but some do seem ignorant of the past and the old realities of institutionalization.

And yeah, self-directing is a double edged sword. I’ve seen it done well and I’ve seen it abused by families just to get some extra money, while not really sufficiently meeting the needs of their family member with disabilities. I also think it’s nearly inescapable in the future, given the staffing shortages we already see in direct care and the aging boomer population that will require even more staffing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Death_Equity 11 points 1 year ago (10 children)

question of where Trump wants to put these people.

Decriminalize/legalize all drugs, transfer all for-profit prisons back to the government and/or not for profit charities, shuffle prisoners around to free up prisons to be converted to mental healthcare and drug rehabilitation facilities, and fund it with a taxed and regulated drug market.

Not that he thinks far enough to come up with that.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Republicans made a deal with JFK to phase out mental health hospitals and replace them with community based facilities that had a more home like atmosphere.

They did the gutting part.

Then JFK was assassinated.

Republicans decided that they didn't have to do any more after that, and LBJ used most of his political capital to get the voting rights act passed.

That's why our mental health system is so broken.

If republicans wanted to fix the system, they could start with funding the VA. Many of our troops wind up with mental health conditions due to their time in the service.

[–] jelloeater85 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Support our troops is a hollow catch phrase...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

back when they rolled that out (Bush era) was when they really started assaulting people with vacuous catchphrases. Opposition to the Iraq was was answered with 'support the troops!' which made no sense... okay, I support them, I don't want them to go get PTSD from urban warfare and killing civilians and leave their lives here to sit around in a tent in the desert at 130 degrees. Another one was if you opposed anything Bush/Cheney was doing, "Why do you hate America??", which is obviously a ridiculously loaded question and very shitty debate tactic.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Driving the news: "When I am back in the White House, we will use every tool, lever, and authority to get the homeless off our streets," Trump said in a video posted on his campaign site in August, saying that he'll work with states to ban urban camping.

  • Trump said his administration would offer treatment and other resources for people who are "just temporarily down on their luck" or have less severe mental health issues.
  • "And for those who are severely mentally ill and deeply disturbed, we will bring them back to mental institutions, where they belong," he said, "with the goal of reintegrating them back into society once they are well enough to manage."

So "every tool, lever, and authority" except building shelters and affordable housing. Because, of course, the homeless themselves are the problem that needs to be fixed, not a symptom of a society that needs to be fixed.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A Democrat proposes a way to help the mentally ill: HOW ARE WE GOING TO PAY FOR IT?

A Republican proposes a more expensive way to punish the mentally ill: NOW THIS IS GOOD POLICY

[–] meco03211 12 points 1 year ago

They flat out don't understand how federal laws are enforced. Most of the shitty anti-welfare or anti-handout "ideas" they have would not save money. I always ask these chucklefucks if they would still support those ideas if they cost more than they saved. They can never answer that question.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yesterday, browsing wikipedia, stumbled on articles that talked about this very thing, on how Russia took advantage of mental health systems. They started to classify nonconforming, rebels as mentally ill. A frequently used diagnosis was sluggish schizophrenia. Anyone who was socially awkward, thought differently got this diagnosis. Cuz if someone is questioning our government, they must be sick in the head

They used this heavily for decades to discredit political rivals, forcible confinement, lock them away, work camps. Think gulag archipelago.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Maggoty 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree that we should take care of our mentally disabled instead of letting them roam the streets.

I do not think that's what cheetoman would do with those institutions.

[–] FastAndBulbous 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm British and we have our fair share of crazy homeless people. However, I was absolutely shocked when I visited San Francisco at the levels of crazy I saw wandering the streets. It was unbelievable and would just straight up not happen in the UK, these people would be in a hospital or care home.

[–] Mr_Blott 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Too young to remember "Care in the community", perhaps?

Btw that was Reagan's fault

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PeterPoopshit 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is how it begins. Trump and his idiot sidekick fascist moron Mike Johnson will try to do a 1939 round 2 against all the gays, transgenders, stoners and while they're at it the jews again because fuck people.

[–] TechyDad 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As an American Jew, I think one of the big reasons why the right is so pro-Israel is because it gives them a place to ship people like me to. They will ignore that I was born in the US, have never been to Israel, have no plans to go there, and that my ancestors didn't even come from there. (Eventually, if you go far enough back, they might, but my attempts to trace my ancestry hit a dead end in Poland.)

The right love that they could just round up all the Jews in America, stick them on a plane, and dump us in Israel to "dispose" of us.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He belongs in one, that's for sure.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] paddirn 21 points 1 year ago

That's a bit ironic, given that he should be committed to one himself.

[–] canthidium 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

we will bring them back to mental institutions, where they belong

As someone that struggles with mental issues, and has spent some time in a facility when I was at my worst, this line pisses me off to no end. Feels no different than what he would say about so-called criminals or immigrants. Wish he would go where he belongs.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

A comprehensive mental health system would have both out-patient and in-patient treatment, just like with physical health. The problem is we've had both extremes - all institutionalization, and all out-patient.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

You really should have a solid financial plan in place if you want to become mentally ill in america. Its not up to my tax dollars to subsidize your choices!

[–] jordanlund 16 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I get it, mental institutions are responsible for some of the most egregious human rights violations of the 20th century.

But that's an argument to REFORM those institutions, not ELIMINATE them.

We should learn from the lessons of the past and, at the same time, make sure people get the mental health care they need.

If they can be successfully treated and released? Fantastic. If they need to be held for the rest of their lives? It's better than allowing them to roam the streets posing a danger to themselves and others.

We see it in Portland ALL THE TIME.

https://www.kgw.com/article/news/crime/portland-psychiatric-facility-unity-center-behavioral-health-lawsuit-attack/283-81de7a64-3a80-4b3d-8968-53b10f9a1d95

https://www.koin.com/local/washington-county/tigard-police-patient-assaults-ambulance-crew-on-mental-health-call/

https://katu.com/news/local/hatchet-attack-in-portland-a-sign-of-a-bigger-problem-mental-health-advocate-says

[–] SoupyHappenstance 11 points 1 year ago

I like where your head is at but I doubt Donald thinks that way. He's not really a reform person.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've worked in both Community Living Housing and one of the Last Institutions in Canada (Which I recently learned has closed as well). And I got FAR more training and resources to do my job at the Institution, and the residents had far more supports and programming. Even a broken clock is right twice a day, we need to reopen institutions, and just have better systems in place to prevent abuse

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Maggoty 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Okay. I agree.

Now tell me with a straight face you think Orange Face is looking to help these people instead of just removing them from view.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks 5 points 1 year ago

He's looking for a future home, me thinks.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m sure he’d love to revive the tradition of putting “troublesome” women into them.

[–] DogMom 5 points 1 year ago

Yep, that was the first thing I thought of after reading the headline. I read 'The woman who.would not be silenced' and it left a big impression on me.

[–] Rusticus 11 points 1 year ago

For himself?

[–] NewPerspective 10 points 1 year ago

Why should he get to pick his prison? Just assign him to one and move along.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

One of Ronald Reagan's gifts to California was a homelessness problem. He closed down the state's asylums and never built the community based netowrk that was supposed to care for the mentally ill. The homeless caused an increse in petty crimes, which meant you needed more police and jails.

It worked so well he took it national when he was elected President.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It's very American to struggle greatly and fail to solve issues other countries don't have.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Only if we can stick Malignant Narcissists in there.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Careful what you wish for Donnie...

[–] Everythingispenguins 4 points 1 year ago

Next prison ships

load more comments
view more: next ›