this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
640 points (99.2% liked)

News

23650 readers
4694 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New findings that U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas apparently failed to repay at least a "significant portion" of a $267,230 loan he received from a wealthy benefactor prompted Senate Democrats on Thursday to step up their criticism of the court's lack of an ethics code.

A personal loan that Thomas received in 1999 from longtime friend Anthony Welters to buy a Prevost Marathon motor coach was forgiven before the principal was fully repaid, according to a report by Senate Democrats on Wednesday based on a review of loan documents provided by Welters.

"With each new report, the American people realize how many lavish, undisclosed gifts Justice Thomas has received from his gaggle of fawning billionaires," Democratic Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin wrote on Thursday in a social media post.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chainweasel 104 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If the previous few dozen ethics violations have had literally no consequences whatsoever and there's absolutely no sign that anything is about to change on that front, I feel like the only purpose of these stories is to desensitize us to it and make it feel normal.

[–] lennybird 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Ethics violations only work on Democrats.

It's the nature of Democrats actually holding themselves to a higher standard and avoiding hypocrisy / cognitive dissonance.

But this is the MO of the GOP -- One standard for Dems; no standards for themselves.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can we survive like this?

It's all right out there on public display. It's never been a simpler choice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Look to Poland's recent election.

So... Maybe.

[–] Fredselfish 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly they want to show us that ethics and laws are only for the plebs and politicians and the rich can do whatever they want.

The fact we are burning down thier houses and dragging them into the streets just shows they are right.

[–] o0joshua0o 73 points 1 year ago

Unelected, appointed for life, irremovable (except in theory), free of consequences, and openly corrupt. The US Supreme Court, everyone.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't forgive student loans. Show us who you really are.

[–] danc4498 10 points 1 year ago

He didn’t give a fuck anymore.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The supreme court went from a respected institution protecting our rights to a corrupted laughing stock. Good job, Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Respected? lol.

It's had it good moments for sure, but if you think it's just the Republican appointed Justices that are the problem, you're wrong.

Social issues are where the establishment Dems and GOP agree to fight BECAUSE they're in near lockstep on the neo-liberal economic order. How does that relate to SCOTUS? Look at the cases involving expanding corporate power and protecting the elites, they're almost universally 8-1, 9-0, 7-2 cases... going back the last 40 years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We have the Warren court to thank for many of our civil liberties today.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He only ever paid the interest, nothing on the principal, and the loan was forgiven/written-off before even the interest payments matched the principal.

This loan write-off is legally counted as "income" and if he didn't pay tax on it he's a criminal, and if the IRS don't investigate, they're not doing their fucking job.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, I'm sure the increased criticism being led by Democrats in the Senate will surely prevent Clarence Thomas from behaving like Clarence Thomas is the future.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

With each new report Americans see how full of shit John Robert’s really is.

All this bullshit talk about being non political and pundits going on and on about how much he cares about his “Legacy”.

What a crock of shit.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Upgraded to a level 4 finger wagging

Clarence's feelings are gonna be feelin that as he goes on his luxury RV trips

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

You ready? Aaaaaaand.... Enhance stern eyebrows!

[–] psycho_driver 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Can anybody generate an AI image of Injustice Thomas giving us the double bird while grinning maniacally?