I'm surprised Starfield isn't in the announcement list, considering AMD sponsored the game to promote their tech.
this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
128 points (98.5% liked)
Games
32591 readers
2176 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
If Bethesda tried to install new tech into their engine the fucking stars would probably explode.
Someone’s probably already working on a mod that adds FSR3 and makes stars explode
Can I have the stars exploding without the FSR3 ?
Oh, I'm sorry. Well, I could put the engine into a landfill where it's going to stay for millions of years, or I could burn it up by adding some new AMD tech to it and get a nice smoky smell in here and let that smoke go into the sky where it turns into starfield
They could not even get the local suns to show at launch. FSR 3 is probably way down the list of other issues to fix first.
Yep. Game doesn't even have fucking native dlss. Unbelievable. Blatent AMD sponsorship. People shit on Nvidia for this type of dogshit but AMD does the same bs.
You can also blame Bethesda for taking the money too.
There is an endless list of shit that we can blame Bethesda for with this game. It's fun but it's held together with toothpicks and bubble gum. And the fact that they marketed this as a "next gen experience" is fucking straight up fraud lol. In a lot of ways this shit is even more ass backwards than fallout 4.
I didn't think it was fun at all
This went into Forspoken back at the end of September.
I tried it out on a 3080Ti and I can confirm it's absolute garbage. Totally hitchy stuttery mess, completely unplayable every time I turned it on. Plus, you have to use FSR2 for your image reconstruction to make it work, so you don't get the image quality benefits of DLSS while you're staring at the frozen frames during the stutters.
Big avoid.
That version had bugs especially in relation to vsync. You should at least try the newer one with some of the issues fixed
Just tried it again. It's just as broken and horrible as it was previously.
Wasn't it supposed to be available for every directx game?
No, you're probably thinking of AMD's Fluid Motion Frames, which is similar to what HDTVs do for motion smoothing and works at the driver level. FSR 3 requires game support.
Wasn’t it supposed to be available for every directx game?
Not automatically, no. The developers have to support FSR, FSR just happens to not be tied to any GPU vendor.
Bit of a bummer but still great tbh, let's hope it becomes some sort of industry standard. Not hoping too hard tho, lately the games released are not even finished, I doubt they'll find the time to implement FSR on top of that
let’s hope it becomes some sort of industry standard
FSR~~2~~ 1.x is built into SteamOS. https://www.phoronix.com/news/Gamescope-AMD-FSR
Edit: correction
That's FSR 1.0, not FSR 2.0.
FSR is a regular upscaling shader that only looks at nearby pixels. FSR 2.0 uses motion vectors and temporal reconstruction, it can't be forced by the compositor into all games like FSR 1.0 could.
FSR 2.0 uses motion vectors and temporal reconstruction, it can’t be forced by the compositor into all games like FSR 1.0 could.
I guess it's then time for Valve to integrate it directly into Mesa then.
The game engine must be tuned to provide the data, Mesa can't force it.
Good to know
Commom steam deck W