this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
117 points (96.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6669 readers
1300 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
117
5000 Destroyed Tanks (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Credit: Oleksiy Pyliov

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

+1380 men +55 tanks +120 APVs +29 artillery systems +4 MLRS +8 UAVs +1 cruise missile

in the last day alone. You okay Z-bros?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Already at the Randy "I didn't hear no bell" Marsh stage.

[–] IndiBrony 9 points 1 year ago

I thougt this was ~~America~~ Russia!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

@nuke how many does Russia have, officially?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Impossible to know for sure but pre-war the estimate was about 14,000 total with about 5,000 of them being "active". The other 9,000 of them were in storage. If all of the number are accurate that means that Ukraine has destroyed Russia's entire pre-war active tank inventory and the only reason that Russia has tanks on the battlefield now is because they are pulling from their Soviet Era stockpiles. How many of those even CAN be made to operate is anybody's guess but I'd be surprised if they could get more than 2/3rds, or roughly 6,000 units, field ready.

I think it's reasonable to say that the UA has destroyed around half of the total number of tanks that Russia is capable of fielding.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Buelldozer I was looking to calculate the percentage, but holly crap, that's a lot!

Perhaps Russia is still using some of those tanks that are considered as "active" as it brought tanks from storage before. I guess it will still be a lot until Ukraine will destroy the last such tank from Russian Army's inventory, but it's still impressive for a nation like Ukraine, even with all the Western help.

[–] FinalRemix 11 points 1 year ago

Russia's Navy was getting wrecked by a country with no Navy. So.... yeah...

[–] wwaxen 11 points 1 year ago

If all of the number are accurate that means that Ukraine has destroyed Russia's entire pre-war active tank inventory and the only reason that Russia has tanks on the battlefield now is because they are pulling from their Soviet Era stockpile

That, plus the ones they're continuing to build. It's not like they've 0 industry.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

according to perun this started happening some time ago with share of destroyed BMP-1 rising and BMP-2 falling (BMP-3s seem to be destroyed at a constant pace probably meaning that they are manufactured all the time) same thing happening with older models of tanks appearing in larger numbers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctrtAwT2sgs

[–] BombOmOm 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Covert Cabal dredged through satellite footage and counted the bastards.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And? What's the number.

[–] BombOmOm 2 points 1 year ago

I know I previously linked a video of Covert Cabal counting tanks (see my other comment), but he just today released a video counting Russia's IFVs in storage.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

IRC IISS claimed 17500 before the war broke out. Remember that the Russians basically throw nothing away, so that probably includes tanks left to rot in a field somewhere. But they're not above sending soldiers to the front in a half rotten bean can, not as if they care.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Hyperreality That seems like 28.57% of the entire Russian tank fleet. Oh well...

@nuke

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Suspect it's more like 50%. The 17k number includes stuff rotting in a field, much of which is likely only good for (refurbishable) parts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@Hyperreality Yeah. That seems to be the minimum in this situation. Even 28.5% is quite a big number.

@nuke