this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
174 points (99.4% liked)

World News

38729 readers
2411 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The United States has quietly delivered the long-range ballistic missiles that Ukraine said it urgently needed and that President Joe Biden promised last month, U.S. officials said Tuesday, and Ukraine has already begun using them on the battlefield against Russia for the first time.

The missiles arrived in Ukraine within the last few days, one of the officials said. Their delivery to the warfront gives Ukraine a critical ability to strike Russian targets that are farther away, allowing Ukrainian forces to stay safely out of range. The officials were not authorized to publicly discuss the matter before an official announcement and spoke Tuesday on the condition of anonymity.

The delivery of the Army Tactical Missile System, known as ATACMS, was shrouded in secrecy, with the expectation that the first public acknowledgement would come when the missiles were used on the battlefield. That intense secrecy is a marked change from previous U.S. weapons sent by the Biden administration. In nearly all other cases, the U.S. has publicly announced its decision prior to the weapons and equipment being shipped overseas.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Everything in the military that is an initialism still gets pronounced like it's an acronym, so I wonder if ATACMS comes out to "attack 'ems"?

[–] partial_accumen 31 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The designers that name things seem to be at war with people that need to refer to them.

Perfect example: The High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV).

That seems like a name some designer laughed at when they thought "good luck pronouncing that!" Someone eventually called it a Humvee or just a Hummer.

[–] cm0002 6 points 11 months ago (4 children)

It's because people insist on pronouncing acronyms unnecessarily. Or better yet, just go with whatever the creator put out for pronunciation

Just say S-Q-L, not 'Sequel'. Just say G-U-I not 'Gooey' (This one just fills me with disgust...)

[–] 9point6 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So those don't really bother me, one less syllable = slightly quicker to say.

However given that, inexplicably with its single syllable, URL as "Earl" absolutely does my head in.

[–] cm0002 8 points 11 months ago

I've never heard that before for URL, I hate it lmao

c/TIHI

[–] fluxion 4 points 11 months ago

Yah I'm not calling them A T A C M S, or H M M W V s, those acronyms are well-warranted

[–] Jessvj93 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Bruh same on the second! Like UI is okay by itself, but for the love of GOD "Gouie"???

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

If you're clicking on a gooey, wash your hands

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

True. Occasionally stuff breaks through that's just easy. ADCAP, TEER, AN/UYK-43... wait, maybe not that one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Jeep is a variant of GP, General Purpose vehicle.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

100% pronounced like attack 'ems

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] SuperJetShoes 7 points 11 months ago

Came here to write exactly that! .

One exception would be the "MOAB", which officially stands for "Massive Ordnance Air Blast", but is surely unofficially the "Mother Of All Bombs" - a poker at Saddam Hussein's statement that he would unleash the "Mother of All Wars".

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if Ukraine can reach the Crimean bridge with these now? I know Storm Shadow hit it before, but that seemed rather risky to spend limited long range weapons on a better defended target. If they can cause reasonable damage to the bridge, it'd make it very difficult for Russia to keep the south supplied.

[–] agent_flounder 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If they can get within 100 miles yes, but these are cluster bomb versions so I'm unsure if that would be effective against the bridge itself.

[–] khannie 6 points 11 months ago

Yeah unfortunately useless against a bridge but perfect for an oul' airfield or two.

Or indeed any logistics depot within any meaningful distance of the front line.

Huge news that they're finally there

[–] HoustonHenry 5 points 11 months ago

Send those bad boys to their forever home 😆

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Their delivery to the warfront gives Ukraine a critical ability to strike Russian targets that are farther away, allowing Ukrainian forces to stay safely out of range.

Because of lingering U.S. concerns about escalating tensions with Russia, the ATACMS version that went to Ukraine will have a shorter range than the maximum distance the missiles can have.

While some versions of the missiles can go as far as about 180 miles (300 kilometers), the ones sent to Ukraine have a shorter range and carry cluster munitions, which, when fired, open in the air, releasing hundreds of bomblets rather than a single warhead.

But the Biden administration balked for months, worried that Kyiv could use the weapons to hit deep into Russian territory, enraging Moscow and escalating the conflict.

The U.S., however, has refused to provide any details on timing or how many missiles would be delivered, although officials suggested that the plan was to send a small number, roughly two dozen.

Ukrainian forces want to use the missiles to help fuel their counteroffensive as it heads into the muddy and colder winter months, enabling troops to strike behind Russian lines while staying out of firing range.


The original article contains 604 words, the summary contains 196 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

I hope they got... Bang for their buck. I'll see myself out.