this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
365 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19123 readers
2725 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Texas and Florida are leading the pack, of course. #winning

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZAX2717 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My kiddo is one of them. She’s special needs and has had it since she was born.

[–] Dran_Arcana 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is she no longer eligible? Did you start making "too much money" post-pandemic for the program or was it some administrative nonsense?

[–] ZAX2717 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah too much money, we were on a state waiver program which basically got us Medicaid, but we were going to get kicked off but COVID started and we qualified for Medicaid but now we’re finally getting kicked off

[–] Dran_Arcana 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can't imagine how expensive it must be to care for a loved one with special needs. I hope you actually are making enough to do so comfortably.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is clearly the best system of government and economic system ever created and there is no reason anyone would want to burn it to the ground.

[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 1 year ago

Best health care in the world too, so I'm told.

[–] Neon 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it unironically is.

it's not my fault you don't elect social democratic politicians

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

A system that can get into this state is objectively worse than one that prevents this and doesn’t rely on stupid humans making the right decision

[–] iforgotmyinstance 16 points 1 year ago

Yeah there's suffering but for a small, brief moment we created immense value for our shareholders.

[–] yumpsuit 7 points 1 year ago

It’s a grievous, feral thing. The Medicaid ‘Unwinding’ is well-followed by the Death Panel podcast, here’s an episode from late August with deeper details.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Based on enrollment numbers at the start of the year, that means roughly 1 in 10 people covered by Medicaid have lost their health insurance in a matter of months.

After the US saw its uninsured rate hit historic lows during the pandemic, millions of the most vulnerable Americans are now falling off the rolls — with no assurance they will be able to find another form of coverage.

Even if you had a change in income or life circumstances that in normal times would have led to you leaving the program, you were allowed to stay as long as that emergency policy was in place.

But that provision expired earlier this year, part of the government standing down from its pandemic footing, and states were tasked with double-checking the eligibility of every person who was on their Medicaid rolls — a process referred to as unwinding.

The fear is that many people would end up losing coverage not because they were actually no longer eligible for Medicaid but because they got caught in some kind of bureaucratic snag.

In most states, more than half the people who have been kicked off Medicaid have lost coverage for an administrative reason — meaning somewhere along the way, there was an issue with their paperwork, not that they were no longer eligible.


The original article contains 978 words, the summary contains 220 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] NatakuNox 4 points 1 year ago

These same states banned abortion, so just another action that proves they are not prolife, prochildren, or whatever word they want to brand their anti women agenda