Wow, they are really dead set on making this whole process a hyper-embarrassing circus of dysfunction, huh?
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
43 points (87.7% liked)
politics
19144 readers
3402 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I feel like that is kind of the whole point behind this thing. They get to completely shut down the government while they play up all the internal strife as if it's not manufactured to keep the government from performing it's job.
I don't think it's manufactured. They want Biden to eat the blame for the shutdown and economic damage they're about to cause. It gets harder and harder to do that when they're clearly the problem.
It's possible they're betting that optics won't matter and that the president always eats the blame for the economy. But this is testing that theory as hard as humanly possible. Seems counterproductive to make more of a show of it.
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand it's gone.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/06/televised-speaker-forum-house-republicans-fox-news
If they're going to do this, they should include Hakeem Jeffries, as well. Yes, Jeffries is a Democrat, and the current Minority Leader of the House, but he has the votes of all Democrats, which means he likely has more support now than any of the Republican candidates.
Just like the Republican candidates have to convince a handful of Ultra MAGA representatives, Jeffries only has to convince a handful of more moderate Republicans.
Although, especially with Jim Jordan in the mix, it's possible that the three candidates might ruin the GOP on their own.
Lol so uh, this is intended to be an internal process that the House just takes care of. I fail to see what the point of a “debate” would be in this context.
You can't fundraise and commit stochastic terrorism off an internal process!
Like do you even republican, man?
Fair points.
Rebuttal: they’re eating themselves alive and everyone else is just grabbing the popcorn lololololol
but why?
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The three men will all appear on the same stage together, according to two sources familiar with the plans, a format that Fox News is billing as a “joint interview” rather than a “debate.”
The network said Baier will “press the congressmen on who should be the next Speaker of the House and discuss the issues facing Congress and the Republican party going forward.”
Scalise and Jordan — the latter of whom former President Trump endorsed for Speaker overnight Friday — have both officially announced their candidacies.
The televised forum reflects the highly unusual nature of the race to replace McCarthy — and the intense public interest it is garnering.
House Republicans are scheduled to have a closed-door candidate forum Tuesday, and then vote internally on a nominee Wednesday.
That nominee will go up against House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) on the House floor, where they will need to secure a majority of members present and voting for a candidate in order to secure the gavel — which could be a tough task in the slim GOP majority.
The original article contains 480 words, the summary contains 176 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Trump should show up uninvited and demand to participate
And the Republican caucus doesn't like this. They're afraid it might "Turn it into a circus.” As opposed to what it is now?