this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
94 points (98.0% liked)

politics

20348 readers
4637 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago

An agreement can be changed to keep marital property out of the hands of creditors.

Given the specific circumstances, that sounds like conspiracy to evade justice. This dude just can't stop criming!

[–] TheOneWithTheHair 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Donald Trump's looming legal troubles may have prompted the former president and his wife Melania Trump to once again revisit their prenuptial agreement in an effort to protect his financial assets ahead of impending and likely contentious litigation.

Trump currently faces four criminal indictments, including two federal indictments, as well as a civil action in Manhattan, in which a judge this week ordered the Trump Organization's New York corporate charters be revoked.

"People are speculating that Trump may be losing a lot of money in this New York suit," Harriet Newman Cohen, a high-profile divorce attorney, told Insider. "Not to mention the millions of dollars he's spending on attorneys in suits all over the country."

[–] FuglyDuck 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you recall during the bill and melinda gates devorce, there was some speculation that it may have been a maneuver to protect assets. (lets say she gets half of everything.... then if he gets sued, the lawsuit can only go after the half he kept.)

maybe this is a similar kind of thing. Personally, I suspect their relationship is transactional. That is to say, as long as he can still be her sugar daddy.... she's going to stick around.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Personally, I suspect their relationship is transactional

Personally, I suspect that owls exist.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


"People are speculating that Trump may be losing a lot of money in this New York suit," Harriet Newman Cohen, a high-profile divorce attorney, told Insider.

"I am certain that post nuptial agreements have already been signed or are in the works," said Cohen, who is not privy to specific details of the Trumps' prenup.

Renegotiating prenups is common practice among high-profile partners, even those who aren't headed toward divorce, attorneys told Insider.

"There is talk of wanting to make sure she and her son are stable and secure with all these lawsuits and judgements," he added.

Bill Beslow, a high-powered New York City divorce lawyer who represented Marla Maples in her 1999 split from Trump, told Insider that nefarious motivations can come into play in prenup renegotiations.

Such provisions could include a requirement that Melania Trump campaign alongside her husband or live in the White House should he win again.


The original article contains 544 words, the summary contains 151 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Yewb 5 points 1 year ago

See bill gates divorce for example.

[–] n0m4n 2 points 1 year ago

So, what will happen if they split their wealth, then Trump loses his half, and goes to prison? I don't care, do you?