this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
638 points (98.6% liked)

memes

10335 readers
2391 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
638
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/memes
 
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pirating is easier than ever too

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And they will never stop piracy. If it can be displayed and shown to your eyes, it can be recorded.

It's certainly a good thing to keep businesses in check. It's very much a "or else.." to them trying to screw people over as much as possible.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And they will never stop piracy. If it can be displayed and shown to your eyes, it can be recorded.

Good news everyone! With this new mandatory ocular implant, we can deliver our content in an immersive and intrusive manner never before considered possible or even acceptable! Sign up now to receive two whole weeks of free premium thought suppressor, with guaranteed minimum levels of harmful radiation!

[–] ikidd 3 points 1 year ago

We've reduced grand mal seizures by almost 30% as of the last update!

[–] hOrni 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How exactly? I find it more difficult than before. Granted I don't download movies anymore, I just search for free streams. And I'm pretty sure that at some point Google will stop showing them in searches.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Do you know any streaming etc sites that are more focused on documentaries? I've been looking for a certain national geographic doc for a while and it's not on any of the mainstream trackers (and not on that website either)

[–] mint_tamas 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Install sonarr, radarr, get a usenet indexer and server account, and maybe set up a few torrent trackers that you have access to. Add Plex or Jellyfin (YMMV) and bam, happy times.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That all seems great, but why do any of that when you can just use a pirate streaming site like hdtoday.cc ?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Sites go down and if I have a copy, it will always be there when I want it.

[–] mint_tamas 5 points 1 year ago

You keep your shit and it’s also generally better quality (if you pick the right stuff to dl)

[–] Oxnvat 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"The free version" How I long for those days

[–] Wogi 7 points 1 year ago

Hulu was great when it first started. An option for one long ad at the beginning and often it wouldn't interrupt you between episodes either.

[–] zovits 20 points 1 year ago

Don't forget them immense selection of languages for both audio tracks and subtitles!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

It was great while it lasted, but company greed killed yet another revenue stream.

Well maybe not for the majority, they will probably pay more since they "don't care" as usual.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago
[–] kameecoding 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

every fucking company wanted to dip their toes into the streaming service cash pool and now they pay the price, unpopular opinion but a tripoly like system that exists with music is the way to go.

Spotify, Apple music are big ones with YouTube Music lagging 5 behind due to the 50th rebranding and there is TIDAL for those who want better quality audio.

similarly Movie/tv show streaming should be limited to a few companies competing with basically the same catalog.

but it won't happen, so whatever, I also don't much care, I have my own plex server

[–] sentinelthesalty 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think advocating for more big tech monopolies is a bad idea, period.

[–] surewhynotlem 6 points 1 year ago

There's already zero competition because most shows are tied to a specific service. Real competition comes when you can get The Office on your platform of choice.

[–] DannyMac 1 points 1 year ago

I agree. If they ran themselves more like the music streaming apps, by maintaining similar content libraries, all this competition would be great.

[–] kameecoding 0 points 1 year ago

I said tripoly, not monopoly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Disagree. I'd argue that the companies releasing the movies shouldn't be the same ones running the streaming services. It would mean they can't double-dip, and they're encouraged to be on as many services as possible

[–] kameecoding 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that would come as a natural result, or rather could be enforced by law, younkinda have to remove these exclusivity bullshit deals for the sake of the customer.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's actually a relatively common idea! A great example is many countries forcefully separate the Internet providers and the companies that own the lines themselves. It means the ISPs share lines and are in competition with every other ISP, and the companies that own the lines are incentivizes to build as many, bigger cables as possible and onboard as many ISPs as possible. It's honestly a great system

[–] dustyData -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Bad take. Spotify shafts artists very hard and rips off users frequently. The only reason they haven't enshittified yet is because they are free from the interest rate mania going on in the US (they are a EU based company) and their actual customers are the music labels, not the final listener. So the final power is in the hands of the music executives not Spotify themselves, unlike with US tech giants that hold all the power against regular citizens. Look at what they want to do with podcasts for a glimpse of their future potential for enshittification.

[–] kameecoding 3 points 1 year ago

how are users ripped off?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It could work. Say the steaming platform takes a 10-15% cut for servers, staff etc. The rest of the user's $10/month flat fee get divided up to the artists based on listening time.

[–] sentinelthesalty 8 points 1 year ago

Arr, welcome back ye salty seadog. Me myself had never abandoned the plunderinn the 7 seas in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Breaking away from Netflix is what killed this golden goose