this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
242 points (99.2% liked)

196

16284 readers
2469 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Blowing up fossil fuel infrastructure would only create more environmental damage. Instead the best course of action is to murder the executives and politicians that allow/subsidize them

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

this comment went from sensible to taliban real quick.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@Whey_Isolate @bezmuth That's right. Even without subsidize, we would use fossil fuel. Not most people and their car. But one tractor can do the job of like 500 people in a field. Then we get a few tons of cereal.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Genuinely came to that conclusion a while back as well. That and the fact that going heavily into politics is probably for most people the best chance to enact the most change. Which is a weird thought.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Half of its made easier for you by its use of flammable material :3

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And the atmosphere is full of oxygen, we're already 2/3 the way there

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I can't help but think that those who block private jets shut go further and destroy a few of them.

[–] Betch 3 points 1 year ago

Based and FF7-pilled