I'm starting to think these politicians don't have our best interests at heart.
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
113 points (85.5% liked)
politics
19080 readers
5553 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The Juliana plaintiffs’ fight will likely be buoyed by the recent landmark win in Montana, where a District Court judge ruled this week that the state Constitution guarantees youth plaintiffs the right to a “clean and healthful environment” — one without the ruinous effects of fossil fuels and the climate crisis.
Awesome to see the Montana case already having a positive effect. We’ll drag this government kicking and screaming out of its reliance on fossil fuels.
Unless it hits Trump's SCOTUS.
OK so there’s no denying the US is a democracy.
What you would expect in a democracy, however, is that the people choose politicians who best represent their interests in a range of topics.
How it feels like in the US, is the people get to choose who will enact the will of industry lobby, and in the
process will hopefully take a few of their views into account (mainly for re-election purposes), as long as they don’t conflict with the will of the industry lobby.
OK so there’s no denying the US is a democracy.
Between gerrymandering, the electoral college and Citizens United, I would say there's room for denial.
Each year, there are a handful of seats that are contested. Incumbents win a staggering amount of elections. I have a hard time voting for anyone who would vote in my interest. I usually vote against the party trying to destroy democracy.
My argument here definitely isn’t against your voting strategy. Please keep on voting against the destruction of democracy. What I am trying to say is that this is not the way it should be, but I am sure we can almost all agree on that.
See, a democracy.
The US, a democracy? Dont make me laugh.
Shit like this is why the "both sides" argument holds some water. Not in the "both sides are exactly same so I might as well jot vote, or vote republican" way, because obviously the republicans are by far the worse party. But the Democrats are not the "good guys" they are just the slightly less shitty guys and we will never fix our problems just by voting for the lesser of the two neo Liberal evils.
True but the point is you'd better suck it up and vote for the lesser of the two neoliberal evils or we'll never see the possibility of newer and more progressive candidates again if Republicans win.
Climate change is global. The US constitution isn't.
If anything, the constitution should provide for citizens affected by climate change.
But there is no way it can impact global "politics" (in quotes because like fuck is climate change just a politics thing).
Juliana was filed in 2015 by 21 young plaintiffs seeking to establish a constitutional guarantee to a livable climate.
That's a pretty tall ask to get a domestic US political document to counteract global climate change.
Exhaust legal avenues before blowing up pipelines.