this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
105 points (95.7% liked)

196

16484 readers
1720 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Someboynumber5reborn 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tankies really ruined the word communism because communism doesn't mean authoritarian or no individuality but tankies made it that

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It just happens to mean that everywhere it got adopted larger than a medium-sized city or longer than a couple of years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What no theory does to a mfer

[–] Someboynumber5reborn 4 points 1 year ago

What authoritarian boot licking does to a mf

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

I genuinely thought it was going to end with something silly like a "your mom" joke

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

hmm, I imagine the then 2 prevalent systems of neoliberal capitalism and soviet-style "communism" to be a pretty terrible combination actually. Although I believe I get what he was trying to say about individual rights within an economy of the commons(or at least thats how I interpret it).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't follow, would you elaborate? Sounds like an interesting debate :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Smaller groups of humans (villages, households, ...?) could decide among themselves whether they prefer to live together by capitalist or communist principles. These smaller groups could function within a larger federation - a bit like the fediverse with its smaller instances where each can decide their own internal rules.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

yeah, thats probably a really unstable combination, as the internal logic of capitalism requires infinite growth, so the capitalist parts will be strongly incentivised to expand into and consume the communist parts.

But maybe different kinds of socialist communities could federate like this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's roughly the idea of Anarchism, Democratic Confederalism, and how the Zapatistas govern themselves. But they're all anti-capitalist.