this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
365 points (96.9% liked)

196

16593 readers
2479 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 117 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Being on Twitter must be exhausting

[–] kib48 35 points 1 year ago

it very much is

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Id rather slam my penis in the door of a luxury sedan than ever go back on twitter.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tits! We can make that happen for you!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

LOOK AT MY LITTLE TEETH

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

@pizzaiolo @epicspongee I used to use Twitter all the time before it got to a point where I couldn’t stand it anymore, and I felt like a weight had been lifted off of me after I deleted the app.

[–] captainlezbian 3 points 1 year ago

There’s a reason she’s got drug problems and Twitter is part of that reason

[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have an issue when the same people who were cheering during the Bush years, gave grudging acceptance at drone strikes during Obama, and were silent during the Trump years, pipe up and say drone strikes are bad now.
Progressives have been saying this the whole time.

Also, a reminder that Obama tried to write regs limiting the use of drone strikes at the end of his presidency. Trump promptly threw them out on entering.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As always, when a Republican does something, it's good and just. When a Democrat does literally the same thing, they're the devil incarnate.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Loyalty over principle.

[–] Zpiritual 24 points 1 year ago

Drone strikes are the holy grail of the military-industrial complex. They are cheap to run meaning that the air force doesn't have to give them a huge budget yet consume precision bombs and missiles at a steady rate meaning that the weapon industry get a secure revenue stream. And they can be scaled up almost infinitely since there is no bad news coverage of wounded veterans or crying widows on us television.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Also, a reminder that Obama tried to write regs limiting the use of drone strikes at the end of his presidency

That doesn't sound good.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People are still using that dumpster of a platform?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People who have a large following and magic emojis next to their name will keep using it because it gives them their validation. Twitter celebs are really in a sad state of existence

[–] HardlightCereal 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Elon Musk is an actual Nazi and anyone who still uses twitter is sus imo

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I got so confused reading this, my brainy hurt :(

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

twitter is really good at making words and phrases meaningless through extreme hyperbole rule

[–] Someboynumber5reborn 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some people really need to fucking log off and find a lesbian to marry

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

What an absolute dumpsterfire of a comment section

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

I am thankful that I touch grass enough to not know what any of this means

[–] animelivesmatter 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why do contras posts always end up this way lmao

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It's her curse.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Observation selection bias is an easy one the GOP likes to take advantage of. Eg: not testing for covid to show covid went down.

Also: drone strike civilian casualties.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also: drone strike civilian casualties.

When did they change how they count civilian casualties? I heard it was under Obama's administration, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

There is quite the back and forth between Democrats pushing for accountability and the GOP pushing against.

From Wikipedia, which has all the references one might need:

"On July 1, 2016, President Barack Obama signed an executive order requiring annual accounting of civilian and enemy casualties in U.S. drone strikes outside war zones ("Areas Outside of Active Hostilities"), and setting a deadline of May 1 each year for the release of such report. However, soon after taking office, President Donald Trump designated large areas in Yemen and Somalia to be "areas of active hostilities," thus exempting them from disclosure. The Trump administration also ignored the 2017 and 2018 deadlines for an annual accounting, and on March 6, 2019, Trump issued an order revoking the requirement. "

The executive order:

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2017-title3-vol1/pdf/CFR-2017-title3-vol1-eo13732.pdf

Trump recinding the order:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/06/us/politics/trump-civilian-casualties-rule-revoked.html

Plus some other dumb shit by Trump:

"During the Obama administration, proposed U.S. drone strikes in locations outside active war zones (i.e., in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia) required high-level approval. The Obama administration process for approving drone strikes in such locations featured centralized, high-level oversight, based on intelligence about individuals suspected of terrorism activity. Obama's approval was required for every strike in Yemen and Somalia, as well as "the more complex and risky strikes in Pakistan" (about one-third of the total as of 2012), and insisted on deciding whether to approve a strike unless the CIA had a "near certainty" that no civilian deaths would result.

...

October 2017, Trump abolished the Obama-era approval system in favor of a looser, decentralized approach, which gave the military and CIA officials the discretion to decide to launch drone strikes against targets without White House approval. "

All sorts of references corroborating those summary:

https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/05/22/obama-drones-trump-killings-count/

The short version is: Obama demanded accountability and his approval. Which did not exist before and was revoked after. Hence, the different counts of casualties is not representative of an actually difference. Only representative of the GOP being shit.

[–] kokesh 2 points 1 year ago

Well, that escalated quickly