this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
206 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2465 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe 42 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I live in a dense neighborhood close to Cleveland, and I can see “Vote no on issue 1” signs all over. I figured a “no” turn out was in the bag. But then I drove through some more rural areas of OH, and there are “vote yes” signs everywhere. Now I’m worried. How dumb can these people be? I mean dumber than voting for trump twice?!

[–] kescusay 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The thing to remember is population density. Yes, in rural areas you'll see all sorts of conservative crap, but no one lives there. Those bright red areas outside city limits are vast tracts of mostly empty land.

[–] Nevermore9197 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely, but In our system, land votes

[–] kescusay 10 points 1 year ago

It's true, but with overwhelming turnout, the hand on the scale can be countered.

So I guess the answer is: VOTE. Vote like our lives depend on it, because they do.

[–] TaterTurnipTulip 4 points 1 year ago

Lots of people seem happy to vote against their own self interests. They fail to imagine a future where they may want to use the same mechanism to help themselves. Honestly, I've just accepted that a large portion of people are incredibly stupid, easily manipulated, and lack any sort of understanding of how their actions may impact their own future.

Hopefully they dont win this special election. Good luck to those voting No!

[–] Sixner 4 points 1 year ago

Similar, went to visit friends in rural Ohio and saw a tremendous amount of "yes on 1" signs. I had only seen like 2 in the city vs hundreds of NO.

Honestly made me really sad.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yep, you're in a pretty liberal stronghold. We lived in a dense neighborhood in Columbus and it was the same way.

[–] misterundercoat 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am really hoping this gets voted NO in a landslide. This is the best opportunity for the sane people of this state to signal how fucking done we are with right-wing extremist bullshit.

Democrats have been losing statewide elections because they have been churning out lackluster candidates and confusing messaging. But this election is as simple as it gets. One issue to vote on, all you have to do is show up. If we can't get this done, we are firmly in the shithole red state category.

[–] HanDuo 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't hope... **VOTE! ** I already voted No! Here in Franklin County it was a 30 minute line at the BOE to vote early just after lunchtime on Tuesday.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Personally I do a lot more hoping than voting, because you can only vote once per election.

[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Democrats have been losing statewide elections because they have been churning out lackluster candidates and confusing messaging.

Hey! Sounds like us next door in Indiana. A few years ago, the Democrats fielded a candidate who had a funny mustache and that was literally what they campaigned on. As in they put it on all the campaign signs. Basically they were saying, "vote for the weirdo!" Good call, Indiana Dems. They're talking about running him again, by the way.

I follow our local county Democratic party on Facebook. Do you know what they said when Roe was struck down? Nothing. Do you know what they said when the state banned abortion and gender affirming care for children? Nothing. Do you know what they said when there was a local event to commemorate a man who died in a lynching that had happened 100 years before? Nothing.

But they do love having their chairman do live video streams where he wears a plaid suit and plays the ukulele.

I wish I was joking.

[–] Chainweasel 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I tried to go vote early yesterday, the board of elections in my county was closed when I went at 2pm even though they're supposed to be open until 3pm. I'll try to go again today and if not I'll have to go election day.

[–] krayj 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am so glad I live in a state where mail-in balloting is the default for everyone. I have only sympathy for citizens in states that still require in-person voting. Good luck with your attempt today.

[–] bluemellophone 2 points 1 year ago

Oregon has state-wide mail-in voting and it fucking rules.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The early signs of a highly motivated electorate follows robust turnout in a handful of other states where voters have affirmed abortion rights after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade a little over a year ago.

Voters have been waiting in long lines and sometimes for over an hour at many early polling places, even as heat waves have swept the Midwest and the rest of the country this summer.

Tom Simmons of Clintonville, just north of the capital, Columbus, stood in line on a sunny Thursday morning and said he planned on voting in favor of Issue 1.

The polarizing battle over abortion in the state, with the constitutional amendment seeking to protect reproductive rights before voters in the fall, has driven the narrative for the campaigns supporting and opposing Issue 1.

Voters rejected, by 59%, a proposed amendment to the state constitution to declare that it does not grant a right to abortion, which would have allowed lawmakers to greatly restrict or ban it.

Associated Press writers Chad Day in Washington, Christine Fernando in Chicago and John Hanna in Topeka, Kansas, and researcher Ryan Dubicki in New York contributed to this report.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] agissilver 7 points 1 year ago

I am overseas and got the notification of this special election on the last day I could request a ballot. I didn't know what it was about and didn't manage to request in time. I see now that it's about raising the threshold from 50 to 60% to pass citizen amendments to the constitution, which would impact the upcoming measure on the ballot in November. While I'm disappointed I won't be able to vote in the special election, I sure as hell will cast in November.