this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
351 points (95.3% liked)

World News

40551 readers
2521 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

A more important issue is not "fake news" but rather highly biased and tightly framed news that purports to be neutral. The hegemonic narrative is actually extremely biased but never criticized. This is completely normalized and widespread in the imperial core, especially among both flavors of politicians.

[–] danc4498 18 points 10 hours ago

I too have watched republican debates.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 24 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Aetherion 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

We already lost what we call information

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Let's be honest. No one, outside of acedemics, really cared about information and the right is happily manufacturing their own.

If you can write something online and the only measure of it's accuracy is how much people agree with it then there is no limit to the stupid shit people will say is fact.

I know there are right wingers waiting in the wings to turn this all on me but believe me when I say this, you would be lost if it weren't for people better than yourself building what we have. The fact that you stand on top of it now and declare yourself the successors of logic and reason is what will make all of this collapse. Your world view is shit and you won't stop until hate unfurls what we've been desperately trying to preserve.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago

"Study finds that water is wet."

[–] Valmond 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So far right populists, against far left populusts? No, against "left".

I bet far right populists lie more than any non-populists.

[–] IndustryStandard 4 points 10 hours ago

Left will rather lose to fascists than do populism.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago

Fake news spread includes "both sides are the same"

[–] [email protected] 20 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Bad title, because

The research draws on every tweet posted between 2017 and 2022 by every member of parliament with a Twitter (now X) account in 26 countries: 17 EU members including Austria, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden, but also the UK, US and Australia.

Their dataset is 100% from Twitter.

So the actual result of this study could be that there are more far-right populists in Twitter. A highly improbable conclusion, I know.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 13 hours ago

"More likely" would imply frequency of false information to overall tweets. Which would be split by political leaning already. The numbers of each side wouldn't matter much in that case

[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago

Not really, you take all those politicians, divide them in categories (left, center, right, populist or not) and check the % of lies per tweets for each category.

[–] Raiderkev 51 points 17 hours ago

No. Fucking. Shit

[–] [email protected] 41 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Today on: Why does reality have woke leftist bias?

[–] GuyDudeman 43 points 17 hours ago

Water is wet.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

The left-right vs factual score is quite interesting

[–] Hamartia 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

So the title should say that right wing and centrist sources are less factual than left wing ones.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

I'm not sure whether that difference is statistically significant though since there are only a couple of left sources included.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I scanned the study and couldn't figure out what a negative factual score means, it only talks about factuality being rated from 0 to 1.

[–] markko 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Figure 1. Association between factuality score adjusted by country mean, parties’ left-right ideology (right), and populism (middle), and government participation (left) with 95% confidence intervals.

I think this means that the y axis represents the deviation from the mean score, not the actual 'factuality score'.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

Ah! In my scanning I missed the "adjusted by country mean" but yeah, you're totally correct.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

BREAKING: Liberal media is closer to mean.

--Fox News

[–] barnaclebutt 1 points 11 hours ago

What's the fit?

[–] FlyingSquid 11 points 16 hours ago

What? Being on the right shows you lack basic critical thinking skills or are conning people?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

But i thought both were as bad as the other one.

[–] FlyingSquid 12 points 16 hours ago

I always like the "they're both the same" people who say things like, "they would oppress queer people too if they had the power!" And then you point out that they did have the power and didn't do anything near to the level the right does and they just shoo you away like a fly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

Yes, but Hitler was a communist so it really is the same, or something!

[–] Freefall -2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Cool....coolcoolcool....so, now put your time and effort into REPORTING WHAT WE DONT ALL ALREADY KNOW, FFS.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That's not how science & research works.

We test the things we think we know and publish our findings.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Well this has been previously tested.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

That's only true in a general sense. Regardless a key component of "doing science" is to reproduce the results of others.