this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
257 points (96.4% liked)

The Democratic People's™ Republic of Tankiejerk

692 readers
475 users here now

Dunking on Tankies from a leftist, anti-capitalist perspective.

Rules:

  1. Be civil and no bigotry of any kind.
  2. No tankies or right-wingers. Liberals are allowed so long as they are aware of this
  3. No genocide denial

We allow posts about tankie behavior even off fedi, shitposts, and rational, leftist discussion. For a more general community [email protected] is recommended.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The workers do not need to control the means of production when Pooh Bear Xi knows what's best for them before they do.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 day ago

Socialism is when capitalism

[–] Pilferjinx 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, you mean the elite, wealthy, oligarch class, Xi Jinping.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

Whoa buddy you a fed? Got any sources? My xi would never.

[–] grue 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If socialism were bad, law firms wouldn't be structured as partnerships.

[–] Takumidesh 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Law firms are so so so not socialist.

Partnerships only involve a few select attorneys at a firm, associate attorneys, paralegals, legal assistants, and every other role is not part of the partnership, and has no stake other than their vested interest in getting their paycheck (the same as any employee).

"Big Law" firms have thousands of employees excluded from any partnerships including billable (associates, paralegals) and non billable (legal assistants, HR, IT) staff, the partnership is more of a private ownership club where people are accepted mostly on vibes and sometimes, rarely, on merit.

The partnership structure is pretty antithetical to socialism, since it's structured in a way to exclude people deemed not worthy of receiving profits (But still somehow needed to make the profits??).

TL;DR: a small group of owner operators within a larger company is decidedly capitalist.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago

karl marx only invented socialism for rich people, read theory shitlib

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The DPRK is, I'd argue, more or less an absolute monarchy that just uses different words to describe itself than traditional for that kind of system.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 23 hours ago

The People's™ Absolute monarchy

Seriously it's insane how people can unironically lie to themselves. Thy literally said "socialism is not for the workers" lmfaoo

[–] SmoothOperator 1 points 17 hours ago

Owning the means of production is a means, not an end in itself. I'd argue the social democratic welfare state comes impressively close to achieving the ends.