this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
92 points (93.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36752 readers
3322 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So. With Elon's closeness with Trump and he's desire for X to be the US'S 'Everything App', could he force any payment of taxes, goods and services to only go through X? Is this possible with his powers? Do you think it's possible or likely to happen? I just envisage him making it mandatory for you to use it for everything and if you don't, you'll have to face fines or other consequences. (I'm from the UK so I may not understand how this might pan out, I just think he's crazy enough and cozy enough with Elmo to force it).

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

Banks would no sooner have him shot on fifth avenue

[–] NutWrench 5 points 13 hours ago

Banks are not willing to shoot themselves in the ass for Trump. They would fight to the end to hold onto that sweet transaction money.

[–] TastyWheat 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He wants it to be America's WeChat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

That's what I was thinking - he now has the resources and clout to make it happen abut to FORCE it people by government decree

[–] Rhoeri 9 points 1 day ago

Force?? I’d be willing to bet he won’t even have to ask.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would be funny because I don't think twitter has the server infrastruktur or the domain knowledge.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

“Please insert envelopes of cash to our dowse-with-gasoline machine that only sometimes randomly sparks“

[–] TsarVul 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

He sure could. Did you know that USPS is technically a government-granted monopoly by way of the Private Express Statutes?

Drumpf could grant X (The everything App (Formerly Known As Twitter)) the same privileges. Maybe not directly, but ultimately it'd have the same result, if they created a service that routed payments through it, and forced citizens to use said service and then grant said service a monopoly.

[–] mipadaitu 12 points 1 day ago

Guess it's time to go back to cash only.

[–] slazer2au 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nothing is stopping him from issuing an EO. Will it stand up to a judge though?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That was part of what I was asking - I don't know enough about how this all works in the US. So an EO could mandate it, but he'd need it to be aproved by a judge?

[–] slazer2au 2 points 15 hours ago

A judge doesn't have to approve it. Of he does it, no doubt some payment gateway companies are going to challenge the order which is where the judge comes in.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It could well be you know. Trump is not tech saaavy and elon could push for it as its his dream. The thing to watch is Larry Ellison go look up everything he owns and what he is in control of.

[–] MothmanDelorian 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The same Ellison who suggested surveillance will be used to make people behave?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Thats the bunny yep. He owns a lot of media and news companies. And he is now i think contracted with government data gathering via the AI stuff a quick search will show ypu all the pies his sweatty fingers are in.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sure he could and would. All he'd need to do is dictate that X is the only payment provider all government departments may use to improve 'efficiency'.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

Yes, that's what I was thinking, then it's a slippery slope to making everything have to go through it

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean he could and could try to force it, but if people were too stubborn to use it wouldn't last long.

[–] tehWrapper 7 points 1 day ago

Just make a payment for something to people and they only can claim it by signing up to use the everything app?