this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
87 points (69.3% liked)

Space

9504 readers
118 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 121 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

Lotta coulds, ifs and mights in this breathless koolaid-drinker's puff piece (actually he's probably just a shill). Lotta rendered images and animations. Lotta lack of anything tangible. Lotta totally irrelevant misdirection in the bottom half of the puff piece.

This isn't a news piece. Nothing new has been done with this idea. It's basically an ad (for vaporware). The headline is technically misleading, as no such thing has been done yet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thunderf00t busted this three years ago: https://youtu.be/9ziGI0i9VbE

Vaporware then, vaporware now

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] aeronmelon 36 points 1 month ago

Engineers who spent their whole childhood watching Loony Toons: β€œMy time has come!”

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You can (theoretically) reach "space" with a single impulse from earth's surface, but you cannot achieve earth orbit that way. To make orbit, you need a circularization burn at apogee to raise your perigee above the atmosphere. Otherwise, its ballistic trajectory will cause your spacecraft to re-enter the atmosphere.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, this is just a first stage replacement. You still need a rocket to get most of the way into orbit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The first stage counts for the bulk of the fuel and total mass, so this would still be a big deal.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah definitely. The way the rocket equation works out, the second stage gives most of the Delta V, but the first stage needs to be much bigger because it needs to lift itself and the second stage.

[–] thelasttoot 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I only understand what you're talking about because of Kerbal Space Program

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I only know it because of Kerbal Space Program. :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I haven't see any kind of news or update from them in over a year

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah looks like they ran out of money.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actually, I stand corrected. It looks like they raised $11.5 million a few months ago and are working on a ruggedized little satellite that would survive their centrifuge.

Also, "founder and CEO Jonathan Yaney left the company" ?

https://techcrunch.com/2024/12/03/once-buzzy-space-startup-spinlaunch-raises-11m-but-hoped-to-raise-more-sources-say/

https://payloadspace.com/spinlaunch-raises-11-5m-to-hurl-more-spacecraft-into-the-sky/

https://youtube.com/watch?v=g-DjBHroA1I

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

No wonder no one trusts the news when they make clickbait headliens like this

[–] JeeBaiChow 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Has it ever launched anything into orbital altitudes yet? So it's like AI, then? Let's pour money into it asap!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EfreetSK 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I remember watching debunking video of this years ago. If I remember right, the problem was how to stop a projectile (a rocket in this case) from spining once it's released. I need to find that video ...

[–] CheeseNoodle 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I did watch that and there are problems but the debunking video itself was really bad and acted like there were problems that had already been addressed in the video it was a direct response too. It still seems like a crazy idea but they have had test launches and there didn't seem to be a spinning issue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

There are many more problems... Creating that vacuum takes time and the centripetal forces involved limit what you can launch. Mammals and complex machinery are a no-go.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

OK, but couldn't the item have some small thrusters with a control system to cancel out any tumbling/spinning once it's launched? That would require some fuel, but a lot less than required for a traditional launch...

And wouldn't fins like on an arrow take care of stabilizing spin around the major(?) axis?

Pls don't flame me, I'm not a physicist or rocket-scientist :)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Did it tumble during it's test launch?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Thunderf00t made a good one.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Looks like they've conducted 10 test launches, but nothing since 2022.

https://youtu.be/kGxmCvLb9bs

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can we use this to throw people we don't like?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It would squish them first.

[–] Bashnagdul 14 points 1 month ago

That's fine we didn't like them to begin with.

[–] scholar 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Spin your enemies at high speeds in a vacuum until they're dead then launch their corpses into space

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Throwing them is gonna kill them anyway, squishing is fine

[–] Majorllama 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I want it to work because it would be so fuckin cool. Yeet my ashes into orbit pls.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

good news

10 successful test flights

[–] JeeBaiChow 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

None of which reached orbit iirc. So y(literal)mmv.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SkybreakerEngineer 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Launcher may handle 10,000 g's, but satellites tend to be kind of fragile

[–] JeeBaiChow 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How many oceangates is that? Can we send CEOs in it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

euthanasiacoaster without the extra steps

[–] Voyajer 5 points 1 month ago

Satellites have to go through shock and vibe testing based on the vehicle bringing them up, satellites using spinlaunch will need to be built around it.

[–] bluemellophone 3 points 1 month ago

You’d be surprised how well modern cubesats are already designed implicitly with high-G components. There was a video about them testing an β€œoff-the-shelf” sat from a professor and it held up with only some minor modifications.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AFKBRBChocolate 5 points 1 month ago

Let's all go reread "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why not use a magnetic launch and put rockets on a rail gun? You could put it on an inclination and accelerate that sucker over multiple kilometers if you wanted to in order to build up the velocity you need. The g-forces would be concentrated in one direction Wouldn't that reduce the number of problems?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The spin launch thing is easier to do than what you're proposing.

A straight rail gun would require INCREDIBLY LARGE amounts of energy to be outputted in minimal time.

The spin launch contraption inputs energy into the spinning hand or whatever slowly over time. The spinning hand stores this energy as rotational energy. This way, while the payload has to go through high g forces for a longer time, you don't need fancy apparatus to input energy.

When it's time to launch, the hand suddenly lets go of the payload, instantaneously converting all that energy to kinetic energy.

The challenge here ofc is to make the hand VERY strong. That's why it's literally a block of carbon fiber.

I really want this thing to work, but uk... They haven't demonstrated any significant breakthroughs yet. I just hope they don't run out of funding before showcasing something substantial.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lanusensei87 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wouldn't the changing magnetic fields damage whichever electronics are housed in the payload?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I don't believe so. The electromagnetic energy is being used for acceleration, no other type of energy. The inside could easily made into a Farady Cage to block some of the electro-magnetic fields.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Haven't heard from these guys in a very long time. Good to see they're still going and actually making successful test launches.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I'm disappointed it's not a trebuchet

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί