this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
914 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

60082 readers
4271 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dustyData 143 points 1 year ago (3 children)

People called me crazy when I told them that Google was leveraging open source to enact their version of an EEE strategy to kill the open internet. But here we are. They embraced open source, expanded Chromium with unethical practices, and now that they have the monopoly of the space and the main voting power on the W3C, they are ready to destroy all that is free and open about the internet.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 year ago

Let's not forget Android as well!

Google's been slowly killing the open-source part of Android for a while now...

[–] tabular 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am once again asking users to consider the eventual abandonment of web browsers. It is too big and complex for competition to actually create new ones, so this was inevitable.

[No offense intended to those working on important changes in forks, just saying proportionally it's only a minor diff, no?]

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] esbeto 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wait, what? What alternative do you suggest? Apps and App Stores?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm probably going to use this as a motivation to finally implement serious Digital Minimalism, and just stop using websites that force me to use it.

Banking will be the biggest problem, but other than that, I don't really need to spend my time on the internet. And this kind of DRM infuriates me so much, that I might just get a life just out of spite.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Any website that implements this API is going to immediately lose me as a user. They can go fuck themselves.

[–] notatoad 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

websites that will implement this API:

  • your employer
  • your bank

websites taht won't implement this API:

  • anything you can choose to quit without significant other consequences to your life
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I hate that you're probably right.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drmoose 7 points 1 year ago

Except you won't have a realistic choice.

[–] Docus 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like that sentiment, but how would you even know?

[–] 4z01235 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. Website requires user to visit using particular browser
  2. User refuses to use said browser
  3. ???
  4. No profit
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But if said website is your bank's website then you will also have to go change banks and refinance your mortgage, or give up on internet banking. And there could be lots of implications like that we haven't thought about yet. Wanna buy something using Paypal? You are shit out of luck if they get on the Google DRM train. It's looking bleak, but hopefully it'll be seen as being monopolistic if Google is the only one who chooses to implement it, and are thus seen to be abusing their market power to block websites from working properly on other browsers. If Safari and Edge also decide to implement it then we are all probably all screwed though.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I'd honestly look for an alternative financial institution that either has an app that implements whatever security they think they need or doesn't implement this DRM bullshit for their website.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's good they won't be adopting WEI, but if my bank or some other critical site decides to enforce a desktop browser with it, I'm still in the same boat. I did think of a way to avoid a WEI browser on my desktop if it comes to that. I can probably substitute a phone app for any critical services, but that's still a drag. I don't like phone apps much, I use a desktop browser for everything.

I think Google's destruction of the Internet is most simply a matter of influence. If Chrome didn't have the huge market share they wouldn't be able to pull off this kind of thing, open source or not. Unfortunately people have a herd mentality with everything on the internet so we allowed it to happen by doing what we always do.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wondered how to deactivate the auto update of Chromium in the setting. There is no checkbox to untick. You have to twiddle with the regedit to deactivate updates. WTF?

Guys, Firefox (or LibreWolf) all the way!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

or Fennec for F-Droid on Android (Firefox fork)

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They have no leverage over the monopoly google has on the browsers marketshare. the only people who can change things are the end users by switching over to non-chromium browsers, but we all know this won't happen

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People said that about internet explorer in the old days

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They lost because they were challenged by a company with more money and bigger interest in dominating the ads market.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Google didn't have more money than Microsoft. Google those days just had a better product, and still a shitton of money. These were still the days of "don't be evil" for Google

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xylogx 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The article refers to Vivaldi’s response as scathing, but I think it is fair and even and the best overall summary I have seen -> https://vivaldi.com/blog/googles-new-dangerous-web-environment-integrity-spec/

[–] gobbling871 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Google has been so far very quiet on this issue. I wonder why.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Metriximor 35 points 1 year ago

Hopefully they prevail, I will be telling everyone I know to switch to firefox, and additionally changing my parents devices to they as well. Thankfully these days it's really easy to do so

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Brave and Vivaldi are both built on Chromium though…

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They can still reject the proposal. Just because they're built upon Chromium, doesn't mean they need to utilise or retain every feature Google adds to it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's not easy this time.

Any browser choosing not to implement this would not be trusted and any website choosing to use this API could therefore reject users from those browsers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For sites that fully embrace the new web environment integrity procedure would that break chromium browsers like Brave too?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That would break websites, not browsers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

That is semantics that wont help the users. They still need to change browser to access their banks website if their bank is enforcing WEI. There is nothing "broken" in the technical sense, the website and browser will be incompatible with oneanother. The blame is clearly on the bank but what's a single user gonna do if this becomes industry standard for banks?

(I am using banks as an example of a service you cant easily avoid, this would also be true for other important stuff like digitialized government access etc ect)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheYear2525 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If only Google supports this, the rest can fork it together.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (6 children)

What about Safari? Will Apple bend over to Googles will and use their new standard?

[–] imjonas 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While I'm glad they are speaking up against it, I don't believe that it will change anything. If Google decides to implement it, it will just end up exactly like it did with WC3 EME, as summarized in this the 2014 article from if I'm not mistaken a Mozilla dev:

I know of people recommending Chrome (not Chromium) because it has Flash Player natively incorporated, so you no longer have to install it separately.

This serves to prove that the majority of users doesn’t know about either the technical or ethical differences in the software they are using.You may also think of the pirated software the are using,but this is a different matter. Ignoring this marketshare goes against Mozilla’s idea of a web available to everyone, not to mention that Firefox is no longer the most used browser as it used to be a a few years ago and it is therefore forced to comply with this kind of requests.

[–] Chickenstalker 21 points 1 year ago

Which is why we have government bodies. As usual, it will probably be the EU to castrate g**gle in the future.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good. WEI is a bad proposal for many reasons. I still can't fathom why so many browsers use Chromium as their base nowadays though.

On another note, what is up with the thumbnail image for this article? The article doesn't mention anything about Alabama's awful attorney general. Hmmm...

[–] stankmut 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There aren't a lot of options for browser engines if you don't want to spend forever playing catch up while writing your own. My understanding is that Gecko, which Firefox uses, isn't as easy to build on top of. The idea with using chromium is that you can focus on building a custom ui or fancy new features without worrying about web pages rendering incorrectly.

[–] aggelalex 16 points 1 year ago

This is perfect. The more browsers refuse to implement this, the more the antitrust against Google is going to sting.

[–] AnyProgressIsGood 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I haven't been following this. What's happening?

[–] notatoad 17 points 1 year ago

google is introducing an API for websites to request a cryptographic attestation that your browser is the official version that it claims to be - that is, not some other browser pretending to be chrome, or a modified version of chrome. apple has had an API to do this for years, and nobody seemed to mind that, but google is pushing it as a standard that any browser could implement and that's made a lot of people very angry.

the main concern seems to be that it will squeeze smaller browsers that don't implement it out of the market. in response, smaller browsers are apparently choosing not to implement it.

[–] UFO64 11 points 1 year ago

Google is trying to add code to it's chromium software that would functionally allow for DRM between you and a website. It would be a huge blow to your ability to control ads and what software runs on your PC when you connect to a site.

[–] Yoz 12 points 1 year ago

Shitty google doing shitty things. Just business as usual

load more comments
view more: next ›