this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
149 points (99.3% liked)

politics

20383 readers
3943 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nialv7 62 points 1 month ago (2 children)

honestly feels like democracy is crumbling in front of our eyes, we are regressing with blazing speed.

[–] disguy_ovahea 34 points 1 month ago

We knew it would. Consider the amount of damage he was able to cause in his first term without a plan, experience, or support, and during a global pandemic.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Seems like you forgot about:

"John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it" -President Andrew Jackson

(I mean... this time, "John Marshall" will just rubber stamp it so... 🤷‍♂️ oh well...)

[–] Sterile_Technique 13 points 1 month ago

Almost every posting on https://www.usajobs.gov/ was just pulled.

I only really hear about the healthcare side of things, so on that note the VA (and veterans who get care there) just got FUCKED.

...this is gonna to cause a tsunami of demand on the private sector that's already hanging on by a thread.

We are firmly in the 'find out' phase.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wow. Mask is off! No pretense now. Nazi agenda being rolled out. It's not MAGA. It's MAWA.

[–] baronvonj 17 points 1 month ago

There really wasn't any masked pretense before the election, either.

[–] SoftTeeth 10 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] cabron_offsets 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah. Clearly a national priority.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I mean, he's been barfing out other orders, left right and center

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So how do you know? Does this mean every none white male is on paid leave now?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think this means employees working in DEI compliance roles. So not DEI hires, but people who are enforcing DEI.

[–] NineMileTower 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think firing someone because their race, religion, or sexual orientation might be illegal. At least for now.

[–] SpaceNoodle 2 points 1 month ago

Since when have they given a shit about laws?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean how many people can this be? Are there actually any people who only work on dei compliance? Seems like one of the many things that would be handled by someone who got cross trained in an HR department.

Would be pretty rad if you were in that position though. Seems likely some people just got a 4 year long paid vacation. After the civil service reform act, trying to fire people like this is a long and uphill battle.

[–] Chocrates 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They have both houses of Congress, I assume the federal government is about to be gutted. They even published a book on it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, but repealing the csra wouldn't exactly solve their issues with federal employees, and would likely cause more problems than it solves.

The CSRA was a compromise between federal employees and the government. Giving up their right to collective bargaining for a set amount of guaranteed rights and options of recourse. If you ended up overturning the csra you would also be getting rid of the prohibitions against collective bargaining and more importantly.....strikes.

Meaning that federal employees would garter the power to freeze aspects of the federal government on demand. Making their collective bargaining power immense.

I'm sure he's going to do a bunch of damage, but I doubt they would go as far as repealing the CSRA, and even if they did, it might be a good thing for workers.