this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
662 points (99.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2108 readers
1372 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Coreidan 32 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Monitor me all you want. Monitor me while you suck my balls.

What are you going to do about it? Nothing.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

You think the trump regime is going to do nothing with a list of people who are opposed to the crimes of the rich?

Violent autocrats love lists of people to persecute and kill. That's been a hallmark of trump style regimes since at least sulla in the roman republic.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

I think trump has some pretty dark plans but infighting and a focus on drama will derail a lot of them like it did last time. True authoritarianism is too complex for his cabinet to pull off.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago

That's a very optimistic position.

I think it overestimates the competence of fascists past and underestimates people like Leonard Leo who orchestrated the fascist take over of the courts and has publicly committed to doing the same to every major industry and institution.

Either way we'll find out I guess.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Far more scary than Trump would be a president with the same ideas he espouses but who actually is a true believer (rather than somebody who just says what he thinks people want to hear), competent and persistent in taking his promises all the way (instead of a flip-flopper like Trump).

It's the reason why the Democrat Party going even more to the Right is dangerous: it's keeps the Republicans in Fascist territory and sooner or later they'll produce America's very own Hitler rather than "just" Trump.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 22 hours ago

Monitoring all nurses, got it.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 9 points 17 hours ago
[–] Vorticity 111 points 1 day ago (8 children)

So, they're finally admitting that they're monitoring all of us.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago

The more people that express negative sentiment the harder it will be for them to go after people. It's your first amendment right, use it. Don't comply in advance.

[–] DontTreadOnBigfoot 227 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So did they just download the US Census and start from there?

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When pretty much everybody is on the list, it's more conspicuous to not be on it.

[–] disguy_ovahea 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

They want a list because there’s a zero percent chance that they’ll successfully manipulate public opinion through social media.

“Hello fellow capitalists! Ready for a new day of supporting free enterprise by simply caring for ourselves?” #nevergonnafuckinhappen

[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 day ago

Health Insurance companies are parasites who only exist to cause people misery in exchange for profit so... everyone?

[–] Whats_your_reasoning 25 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

That's fun. It does nothing to stop the near-daily in-person conversations with coworkers, friends, and family about this one topic that unites us all. So long as we're beholden to this health insurance system that screws us over at our most vulnerable of times, those conversations aren't going to stop.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago

In his manifesto, Mangione suggested the health insurance industry had “gotten too powerful, and they continue to abuse our country for immense profit because the American public has allowed them to get away with it.” He could just as easily have been describing the national security state.

[–] DaddleDew 86 points 1 day ago

Imagine if government resources were spent on applying antitrust laws to stop this abusive situation that literally kills people and ruins lives instead.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

UHC just sent me a survey. I was honest. I'm on a list now!!!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago

If you got the survey you were already on the list.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 day ago

"Do you have the faintest idea of how little that narrows this down?"

[–] [email protected] 123 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You can't put us all on the little list

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can't put us all on the little list by definition, because then it would be the big list.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

A list that includes everyone is useless from a data analysis point of view.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 day ago (1 children)

so, like most people who have ever had to attempt to use it combined with those who could only hope to afford it? thats prolly a long list.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 day ago

Hi, FBI agent! How are you doing today?

[–] Manifish_Destiny 36 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You can monitor this dick.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"We already have. And there is literally 'Nothing to see here.' "

[–] Lemminary 18 points 1 day ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Iheartcheese 59 points 1 day ago

I hope more die.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The fun part will be when Trump rips apart the alphabet soup intelligence apparatus and displaces much of the senior leadership. Those guys have spent decades building webs of deep and strong connections, and I would be 0% shocked if those guys were able to successfully mount an insurgency against the Trump presidency, and they'll likely take with them the list of dissidents and malcontents to contact.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Idk, I just think it'd be peak comedy if, after sponsoring right wing movements around the world for seventy years, CIA leadership was forced into leading a left-wing counter revolution here at home

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›