this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
88 points (96.8% liked)

Canada

7402 readers
441 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Smith is straight up looking like a treasonous traitor right now.

[–] Drivebyhaiku 20 points 1 week ago

She should be given the biggest of side eyes. A lot of the laws Alberta has been passing are fairly direct challenges to Charter rights.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Yeah

I always start hostile negotiations by saying what would hurt me the most and not committing to back up my own interests.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Dude. That's her mandate. It's not that she's betraying Canada; it's more that the R.o.C isn't really a consideration. Barely an afterthought, there to buffer the oil numbers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

She's even betraying Alberta. Yes, because "Alberta" is not the same as "the oil and gas industry".

The conservative oil boot-lickers in Alberta have decided that the province must suffer Dutch Disease no matter what and at the expense of everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was watching CBC coverage of some press conference Poilievre was doing, going on and on about the need for an "axe the tax election" (??). Someone asked Poilievre what he was doing to fight against Trump's proposed tariffs and Poilievre says he's not the prime minister, but if Canadians give him a mandate, he'll fight for their interests, etc.

Then the CBC commentator cuts in and says "It should be noted that there are many people who aren't the prime minister who have decided to adopt a "team Canada" attitude and are doing what they can to make the case against tariffs."

The bluntness and absurdity I just found hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s so weird that Danielle Smith and Pierre Pollievre are breaking ranks. It’s like their entire philosophy is “Fuck Trudeau”. Shows who’s side these fucks are.

Even the other conservative premiers are supporting Justin Trudeau.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

It's not weird, their interests are not the same as your interests and certainly not the same interests as the average Canadian or Canada as a nation.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The bluntness and absurdity I just found hilarious.

I'm glad someone is calling him on some of the bullshit.

Note that the weaselly fuck didn't answer the question about what he would do. I bet he has the beginnings of an inkling of what he could consider doing if he's prime minister -- or what was Mr Trump's status for his any-day-now healthcare master plan from 8 years ago?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But Poilievre, who polls suggest could become prime minister in the next federal election, repeatedly refused Thursday to say whether Canada's energy exports should be part of a Canadian retaliatory strategy. Poilievre's dodge came after Alberta's leader broke ranks with her provincial counterparts and Trudeau and refused to support any plan that did not have a carve-out for oil and gas.

Hey, Pollievre said something definitive? Hopefully people are listening that he cares more about oil and gas than the entirety of the country.

Ontario can lose all its manufacturing jobs, but we have to protect oil and gas. BC can burn and flood, but we have to protect oil and gas.

Poilievre at one point challenged a question on energy tariffs, saying he didn't understand it because “we don't import almost any oil and gas from the Americans, at least raw oil and gas. We mostly export it.” Canada’s energy regulator says the U.S. remains the top destination for Canadian crude oil, but also says the U.S. is the largest source of Canada’s imported crude oil, with 72.4 per cent of Canada’s oil imports originating from the U.S. that same year.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

I've seen "I love oil and gas" advertising... It's a mental illness.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Aside from him not knowing how to campaign against anyone but Trudeau, this dodge could be quite a weakness for PP going into the election. If other parties are smart, they'll capitalize on his evasiveness about defending Canadian sovereignty.

[–] fourish 6 points 1 week ago

PP has no plan and won’t stand behind anything. Canada loses if he’s elected. Just look what happened in the states when cons elected trump. Fail.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Conservatives are 5th columns.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago