this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
123 points (96.2% liked)

Data is Beautiful

5121 readers
3 users here now

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

  A post must be (or contain) a qualifying data visualization.

  Directly link to the original source article of the visualization
    Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article as a link-type submission.
    If you made the visualization yourself, tag it as [OC]

  [OC] posts must state the data source(s) and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.

  DO NOT claim "[OC]" for diagrams that are not yours.

  All diagrams must have at least one computer generated element.

  No reposts of popular posts within 1 month.

  Post titles must describe the data plainly without using sensationalized headlines. Clickbait posts will be removed.

  Posts involving American Politics, or contentious topics in American media, are permissible only on Thursdays (ET).

  Posts involving Personal Data are permissible only on Mondays (ET).

Please read through our FAQ if you are new to posting on DataIsBeautiful. Commenting Rules

Don't be intentionally rude, ever.

Comments should be constructive and related to the visual presented. Special attention is given to root-level comments.

Short comments and low effort replies are automatically removed.

Hate Speech and dogwhistling are not tolerated and will result in an immediate ban.

Personal attacks and rabble-rousing will be removed.

Moderators reserve discretion when issuing bans for inappropriate comments. Bans are also subject to you forfeiting all of your comments in this community.

Originally r/DataisBeautiful

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/4821847

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/dataisbeautiful by /u/ptrdo on 2025-01-03 03:39:05+00:00.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"If one in 70 Trump voters changed their vote to Harris" is daydreaming in style now?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago

Anything to avoid responsibility in this loss

[–] tomi000 5 points 3 weeks ago

1 in 70 is over 1%, thats huge xD

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Other than just trying to get everything to fit, is there a reason why the x-axis labels are split between top and bottom?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

to point the finger at anyone but the democrats for losing to trump again.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

The author hates you.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Wow whata up with the extreme blue in dc?

[–] meeeeetch 20 points 3 weeks ago

That's the margin the Dems have in big cities. But unlike all the states where you have cities, their suburbs, and the rural space between, DC is nothing but urban center.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

No rural area for GOP to exploit

[–] Mojave 15 points 3 weeks ago
  1. DC is small. Not quite Vatican small, but DC is essentially entirely urban. Urban areas are democratic.

  2. DC is not a state. They don't get any representation in Congress because of this. Democrats are the politicians promising to try and get DC a seat in Congress so that they may be represented. They passed a strange bill that allowed DC to have Shadow Congresspeople who vote in Congress, but their votes don't get counted for anything. Republicans do not want DC to have any representation.

  3. This may be anecdotal from being a local and speaking with people from DC, but there's a general idea that DC and the surrounding NoVa and MD areas are taken care of very well by the federal government. No president or congressman wants to work and live in an area surrounded by crime, homelessness, and crumbling infrastructure, or else they might feel bad. Democratic leaders tend to push for legislature and infrastructure that supports the local community, while Republican leaders have historically shown a mindset of "Fuck everybody else here" and not supported the local community. Reagan flooded DC streets with Contra crack to get rid of "degenerate blacks" in the community. On the flip side, Clinton and Obama fought for DC to get state rights to be represented in the government.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Once again, non-voters. Enjoy the next four years. You deserve it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Also ppl who voted "Other"

[–] MyDogLovesMe 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

When your own courts legalized Gerrymandering, this simply isn’t a surprise at all.

[–] EvacuateSoul 10 points 3 weeks ago

Gerrymandering has no direct effect on statewide races.

[–] Shardikprime 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well yeah

If my grandmother had wheels, she would be a bike

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I blame the protest voters. They screwed us over in 2016 too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You think that you are going to change the behavior of tens of thousands of voters by bitching about it? If you want to change how they vote, do something about it.

If someone's still protest voting in this situation, it indicates issues with the candidates rather than the voters.

Kamala's refusal to address the Israeli Genocide and the fact that she was the second candidate forced on the people by the party in an undemocratic way were the main reasons IMO. She was not a popular candidate in 2020, it was surprising she did as well as she did TBH.

They both may be political necessities for some reason but I believe that's why the dems lost. Also sadly, I don't think a black woman had any hope of siphoning off any potential Trump voters.

None of this would have happened if the DNC had allowed Sanders to win in 2016 instead of stealing the primaries with superdelegates. Nobody ever polled better against Trump than Sanders. In 2020 or 2016. But instead of letting him mop the floor with Trump. they fought him tooth and nail and even rigged the primaries against him.

You reap what you sow.

As someone who's protest voted in a strongly blue state for years and who voted Biden only as a vote against Trump, I can't say I support protest voting when democracy itself is on the line, but I can understand the motivation behind it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Jfc not this again. The field was open in 2020 and Bernie lost. 2016 you had a point but he LOST in 2020 to Biden. It's no one's responsibility to "let him win." It's voters' responsibility to vote him as the candidate. They didn't.

Signed, a Bernie voter who got off their ass in 2020 to vote for him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Sorry, I meant more in 2016 where the DNC stole the primary with superdelegates (edited my original post to reflect rhis), though in 2020 they also systematically stole delegates from him.

The reason they lost twice to Trump all come down to these choices. If they had let Bernie win, Trump would be dead and buried. They dug their own grave.