United States | News & Politics

The Most Powerful Man in America is a Nazi ~~Sympathizer~~

Fixed it for you

His grandparents were Nazis. His parents intentionally moved to Apartheid South Africa where they ran illegal emerald mines. He's said he needs H1B visas because he wants to drastically overwork his "employees" and if they're not on H1B visas they'll leave. Is anyone at all surprised by this?

9 ppl sit at a table. comes a nazi and sits down with them. nobody stands up. bam:10 nazis sit at the table.

the american voter has already taken half of those seats.

The only reason wealth makes someone powerful is what other people are willing to do for some of that wealth.

If everyone that wasn't a Nazi decided they won't do business with a Nazi, his wealth wouldn't mean anything.

For some reason lots of idiots keep using Twitter tho

Henry ford all over again

The Most Powerful Man in America is a Nazi Sympathizer

So is their newly elected president. What's new?

Its weird these days. Parties that some call as nazi, are praising, and supporting putin, who is an ex-KGB agent, praising stalin, and trying to re-build the soviet union. Most of the "right wingers" now support putin, AFD too (and putin supports them too, to destabilise democracies).

Which one are we talking about?

Spoiler alert: He's not the "most powerful man in America".

Here's an interesting discussion on Vox of what he might run up against in the new administration, specifically squaring off against Baby Goebbels.

When elon musk takes donald trump on a walk, where do you suppose he puts the leash?

Again.

outright false information

Lies. They're called lies and should be reported as such.

if only Dem neolib leadership had taken "the most important election of our lifetimes" a tad more seriously..

Wouldn't be the first time. But it ought to be the last.

Unfortunately people weren't convinced to get the fuck out and vote so. Y'know.

And you know what we do with nazis.

His political power is premised in large part on the supposition that his following on X is authentic. Given his interests in AI, self-professed belief that Twitter, as it used to be called, is overrun by bots, and ownership and control of X, is there any reason to believe that this is true? How do we know that his human following hasn't declined precipitously since his hard-right turn and been steadily replaced by bot accounts?

I know, you'll say "but--richest man--can buy politicians" and I say yes, but only on credit which could get yanked away at any time, should his following be revealed as inauthentic. His net worth is premised mostly on stock shares in a company with serious problems (which he is doing nothing to solve) facing stiff competition in a troubled niche industry (the electric car market). He had to borrow huge amounts of money in order to buy Twitter because he does not have the cash and if he were to sell that much money in Tesla shares it would cause an investor panic and precipitous decline in his net worth.

And so now we can see why he likely had to buy Twitter; he probably had no choice: the company was likely about to expose or tamp down on his fraudulent and bot-driven following, which would create loss of investor confidence in his brands, which is the only thing propping them up given their weak fundamentals. The Emperor has no clothes, folks.

All the MAGAts are Nazi sympathizers.