this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
133 points (99.3% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

7045 readers
673 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Valmond 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because that would of course be a war crime. Too powerful.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Given the historical obsession of Russians to make the most giant everything even to the point that it will bankrupt themselves, I fear if Ukraine did this, Russia would just build the world's biggest trebuchet and become the supreme world leading nation.

[–] Aganim 13 points 2 months ago

I think the odds are higher that their trebuchet backfires and demolishes the Kremlin instead.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

If you scale up the trebuchet enough it gets large enough to throw things on a suborbital trajectory and you can use it to throw nukes at other continents!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Can't wait until some Ukrainian telegram feed announces that they have working prototypes of this, maybe in 2 weeks?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I would guess that a ballista would provide more launching capacity per unit of weight of the launcher than a trebuchet and would be shorter, easier to hide.

Launch frequency may also be a factor -- like, you might want to launch multiple UAVs off one launcher quickly for a massed strike.

I remember being a little surprised that the Switchblades used a compressed air launcher instead of those elastic band launcher things, but it might make sense if the goal is to be able to keep quickly lobbing them into the air quickly or if having a compact launcher with rapid teardown/setup is critical.

[–] thenextguy 9 points 2 months ago

Geneva Conventions be damned.

[–] iflyspaceships -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why use trebuchets when they can use a Catapult. A far superior seige weapon.

[–] Diplomjodler3 18 points 2 months ago

Clearly a Russian disinformation agent.