this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
36 points (78.1% liked)

movies

1944 readers
200 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

And looks objectively terrible compared to basically ANY major motion picture released this year (perhaps just short of the great film but terribly-lit “Rob Peace”).

I was flabbergasted that such horrifically flat lighting and incredibly dismal/uninspired camera work didn’t trigger any reshoots (particularly with the $150 million budget they had and, as a consequence, the equipment they had at their disposal.)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They could have shot it on a potato and most people wouldn’t have noticed.

I’m probably not most people since I do this professionally.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

fair enough, im not saying it doesnt look like shit, just that people who like wicked ate it right up. I didnt see it because I am straight

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Maybe your theater didn't illuminate it correctly? I saw it twice, both IMAX and non-IMAX and it looked incredible both times

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago

I used to be a projectionist.

The projector was fine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

There are articles with the cinematographer about how they deliberately made everything grey.

[–] jumjummy 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Anytime I hear anything about this movie I remember the hissy fit the lead actress made over the fan edit of the poster. “How dare they erase my face! Racism!”

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The amount of marketing for this movie makes me not want to watch it. Tbh I was never going to watch it in a theatre anyway. Would you guys recommend it to a non Disney fan? I've been watching all major 2024 releases digitally, so I was wondering.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

It was fine but not exceptional in my opinion.

[–] reddig33 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Grease (1978): $328 million

Wicked (2024): $634.3 million

Unadjusted for inflation, of course.

[–] reddig33 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Adjusting for inflation shows this Wicked claim to be marketing bullshit.

https://www.in2013dollars.com/us/inflation/1978?amount=1000000

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

When talking about box office grosses, Hollywood never adjusts for inflation unless specified otherwise.

[–] BradleyUffner 4 points 3 days ago

I enjoyed the movie overall, but casting Jeff Goldblum as the wizard was not a good choice.

[–] brutallyhonestcritic -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

As others have mentioned, this movie looked like

dogshit.

This is what happens when you give an inexperienced, low-budget DoP a 100 million project because of little more than gender.

Listen to her squirm: https://youtu.be/ZRL8NSOgOj8

[–] triptrapper 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We have TONS of examples of "inexperienced, low-budget" male DPs shooting blockbusters. Sometimes they look great, sometimes they look terrible. Women deserve those opportunities too. That's how they become experienced.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 minutes ago

interesting case you stumbled upon here 😭 they disappear from comments for ten months then return to exclusively trash on Alice Brooks, stating without evidence that she is a meritless recipient of DEI benefit. all their recent comments (that don’t get banned straight away) have no less than 8 immediate upvotes with their interlocutors often getting mirror downvote treatment—which just screams vote abuse to me*. very unique character here.

*this is speculation and i could be wrong