Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
Let's be 100% clear, all of these cars with "smart" features are collecting your data and selling it. Insurance companies are also buying this information and using it to raise premiums if they determine you a "bad driver." Also this could reveal info such as where you live if anyone is determined enought depending on the info if stores (such as geolocation data).
Basically I'm saying wrap your car in tinfoil
I live in a small, rural community. The county sheriff's department just announced how they bought the GPS tracking data for every vehicle in the county and how it's going to "help calm traffic because they can predict where people are going to be speeding and can have an officer waiting"
The pre-crime department is starting and no one batted an eye.
Every time I hear something like this I'm glad I bought an old car without any connectivity.
Same, for now. Although, we have two ICE vehicles and want to swap to electric. I haven't looked, but I can't imagine there's a great selection of electric, but 'dumb' in the US, considering GPS was mandatory for new vehicles in .. 2016, I think?
I've also heard people say you can just pull the fuse for the GPS, but I'm still skeptical.
You can choose om the software if you want location services or not, but everyone leaves it on. This is what is leaked. If you turn it off it doesn't report in location centrally at all.
My car is a 2012, I'll be holding onto it until it falls apart.
Just let the car deduct the points from my licence automatically already.
Hmm. Is there a faraday vinyl I can wrap my car in?
Or, alternatively, would the pelts of tech billionaires offer any protection?
Or just pull the fuse to the antenna?
Are antennas usually behind a fuse?
Mine was, it'll be called OnStar in the manual.
Here's a post with a pic https://sh.itjust.works/post/16735052
Ah, pretty sure that'd be the whole OnStar transceiver, too (which isn't a bad thing to disable...).
I thought the antenna itself was behind a fuse (as in, feedline has an inline fuse) which would be a peculiar design I think.
No, you'd never put a fuse between transceiver and antenna.
A Volkswagen id4 was the best choice I had from work (Belgian companies give company cars for personal use as perks because of tax benefits).
I completely disagreed to all terms involving internet access in the vehicle, but I have no doubt they are tracking me without my consent too...
If they are, make a complaint to your local governing body. See if they'll investigate it. Because it's not okay for them to agree to terms for you or to try to end around the agreement you made.
There's no way to know though...
Sure there is. Most people don’t have the hardware handy to do it, but at the end of the day it’s just a computer sending IPv4 traffic through an LTS cellular modem to an S3 bucket.
And if you know your car’s UDID you can probably look it up in said S3 bucket, since it was open to the public.
Take your car into a dealer and ask them if the modem is connected. Frame is as you think it's malfunctioning and they'll look to see.
I mean, they could disconnect it for you, but there's still no way to know if it's been transmitting data you don't want it to in the meantime
"Accidentally"
From what a gathered, it was the classic misconfigured AWS S3 Bucket. ~~It's criminal how AWS still makes the default configuration insecure.~~
Edit: apparently buckets are private by default now, haven't set up S3 in a while.
The default for net new buckets is actually very strict.
But it's that strictness that makes devs just to open it up to everyone and not learn proper IAM syntax.
The unfortunate part is that AWS made rules and privileges so nuanced and detailed that it makes people want to make everything public and deal with it "later".
How do people end up finding them? Don't they have random UUIDs in the URL? Or are they predictable?
All you have to do is monitor the network traffic and then scan any AWS subdomains/IPs that pop up.
[edit] this makes me think… it’s not really possible for a secure connection from all of VW’s vehicles to an S3 bucket, is it? Anyone can pull the key from any of the millions of vehicles making the connection. Then they can dump whatever they want into the bucket.
You could secure it using an IAM user with credentials but then those credentials would be available on all vehicles.
If the vehicles had direct access to S3, maybe that's why the bucket was public? But you could also just leave it available to the public.
But if that was the design, you should sweep the bucket on a regular basis to make sure there aren't any objects over x hours old or something like that.
Bucket names are often committed to GitHub. It used to be that bucket names could be published but ever since the blog post of the guy getting fucked by people polling his bucket due to an open source project typo made others realize that bucket names should probably be secrets.
There are bots that will just monitor all public commits to github, gitlab, etc. for AWS credentials and other strings like that. And as soon as they are found they will start to abuse them.
It was also the classic "collecting the information to begin with," and it's criminal how that is allowed, too.
It doesn't default insecure anymore and it bitches at you when you try to make it public.
My bet would be that It was either a pre-existing bucket, or some team put a "temporary" measure in (making it public) instead of using the API to pull the data until they got around to implementing it correctly.
After dieselgate and the discovery that VW was subjecting monkeys and humans to exhaust fumes in experimentation, their sales are still fine.
I honestly don't think consumers give a shit about what negative things companies do.
I think they just don't know. People are oversaturated and oversaturated and overloaded, and suffering for scraps, nobody has time, mental space or money to be choosy. Researching companies, suspiciously doesn't show results. Finding that information isn't easy, by design. It might be released, on the same day something else happens. But mostly people aren't watching the news to the depth required to soak that stuff in, and don't have the extra energy to soak anything in. Everything sent into our hands and eyes as news is controlled by a few with vested inrests. It would be lovely if there was a place that collected atrocities and kept them fresh. Who stopped buying nestle after all the horrible things they've done. I can bet you have supported a company with your dollar, that's responsible for huge atrocities, it's almost impossible to avoid. Look at the stuff happening in the Congo atm, all the top brands, committing atrocities for new phones to be built. How much have we heard about all of that? There's so much. Where do you start. Funny story, I watched resident evil with my kid, just recently, and it was terrifying for whole new reasons. A top company who owns everything, goes into weapon manufacturing and creating advanced bio weapons, accidentally releases it, then doubles down continuously, shutting thousands in to die, and firing into crouds to cover up what it did. And that doesn't seem far fetched, any more. All for the ever expansion of money, something that has a finite amount set. Literally the only way to achieve ever expansion is to commit atrocities, there's a point where you take too much and the only option is atrocities to make more. And that's capitalism, baby!!
That’s why there will be many more Luigi’s before anything improves.
"Accidentally" is the new "through incompetence"
Negligence. Volkwagen can afford competence, but chose not to invest in it.
Is there a company yet that let's me pay them to internet disconnect and rip out sensors on a modern car?
Dacia doesn't have that crap. They only have the mandatory SOS system.
BTW, if someone has a way to rip that system out, please share
Has someone located the frequent visitors of "houses of ill repute" yet?
The republicans are on it in the US, but now they call them drag shows.
…and hospitals.
GDPR/DORA monies when?
I would love to know how to disable telemetry on my own hard drive on wheels or at worst prevent it from phoning home. Mozilla did a great job bringing this issue to light but now we need actionable solutions that don’t rely on governments passing laws
Accidentally, lol. The point was to mine and sell the data, wasn't it? Not exactly private.
The made public part is the accidental
Anyone that has owned a recent VW, knew this was true. I would get text messages from my local dealer anytime I was close to needing an oil change.
Wouldn't that just be a time based notification rather then dependent on any privacy invading metrics?
Not from my experience. I went from driving the car like 30000 miles a year to like 5000, the text messages were always about right on time for my services based on miles driven. Clearly the car was reporting to VW in some way routinely.
