this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
58 points (85.4% liked)

News

23720 readers
3875 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Geoffrey Hinton, the “Godfather of AI,” warns of a 10-20% chance that AI could cause human extinction within 30 years, citing the rapid pace of development and the likelihood of creating systems more intelligent than humans.

Hinton emphasized that such AI could evade human control, likening humans to toddlers compared to advanced AI.

He called for urgent government regulation, arguing that corporate profit motives alone cannot ensure safety.

This stance contrasts with fellow AI expert Yann LeCun, who believes AI could save humanity rather than threaten it.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 days ago

AI will not cause human extinction.

Humans will cause human extinction by being complete dumbfucks. AI may simply be the tool we use

[–] FlyingSquid 25 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I am so much less worried about being wiped out by artificial intelligence than the kind that evolved biologically.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Artificial intelligence will never surpass natural stupidity they say

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Honestly, it’d be something of a relief. I like that future far more than the path we’re currently headed down.

[–] Tyfud 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

AI will wipe out humanity, but not directly. It will take the form of causing massive acceleration of climate change, draining the potable water supply, etc.

All for our hubris.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Good. Humanity is a failed experiment.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago

Hinton emphasized that such AI could evade human control, likening humans to toddlers compared to advanced AI. ... This stance contrasts with fellow AI expert Yann LeCun, who believes AI could save humanity rather than threaten it.

Contrary to what the reporting suggests, these views don't seem to be contradicting each other. Yann LeCun says AI could save humanity, while Geoffrey Hinton says that, in the absence of strong government regulation, AI companies will not develop it safely. Both of these things can be true.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Ai is less of a threat than climate change. But we get both anyhow.

[–] njm1314 8 points 6 days ago

It would be a mercy killing at this point.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Will AI extinction be more pleasant than human caused extinction?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

this how I feel. whelp there is the definite extinction we are accelerating into and then the possibility of an existentail extinction from other sources.

[–] prime_number_314159 3 points 5 days ago

An AI actually more intelligent than humans is probably not a huge threat, many of the mutual cooperation things that make humans work semi-well together apply to an AI. Likewise, an LLM is unlikely to cause any problems just by existing.

Instead, I think the big danger is something like an LLM that convinces people that its smarter than they are (probably by being able to recite more facts than they can, or offering copy/paste explanations of advance topics), and is then put into more and more places of trust.

Once it's there, we have the open possibility that something "weird" happens, and many many devices, controls, etc simultaneously react poorly to novel inputs. Depending on the type of systems, and how widespread an issue it is, that could cause extremely large problems. Military systems might be the worst possibility for this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I’m confused, is AI a dumb parrot that is good at spitting out convincing bullshit, or is AI a sentient genius that will destroy us all? Every article and comment about it is one or the other, and it can’t be both.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

LLMs are the former. And we're probably at least one breakthrough away from building something that can actually think. Not helping things is that we don't know what thinking actually is.

[–] MrNesser 2 points 5 days ago

There's a few ways AI could go

  1. It's completely indifferent to us, ignores us completely and does its own thing
  2. Someone takes a shot and we end up in a war ala the matrix
  3. AI sees us as needing it and takes over like it does in the polity novels

Realistically 1 is best case as 3 would cause civil war as governments lose power.

The only problem with 1 is it inevitably leads to 2 as we are ignorant idiots

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

I’m in favor of human extinction. It’s not personal, it’s just better for the universe if we stop existing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

Humanity is far more likely to be wiped out by Natural Stupidity.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Unless somebody makes tens of thousands of super soldier bodies that require no recharging and are powered by AI CPUs I don't think we have a lot to worry about.

I don't think AI will either destroy or save humanity, it's just a tool.

Sure accidents may be caused by connecting AI to dangerous things like power plants, but we can still pull the plug.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Points to the upcoming drone wars