this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
91 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2958 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The closed-door meeting of the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee, which is closely aligned with Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., yielded 34 votes for Connolly and 27 for Ocasio-Cortez, according to a member of the panel. The position opened up after the top Democrat on Oversight, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., challenged Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., for a similar post on the Judiciary Committee, prompting Nadler to bow out.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brlemworld 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course they pick a Gerry-atric white man... 😞

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Came here to complain about geriatric leadership and saw that you'd already scored that point. You know what? I'm still mad enough to talk about it. Fuck this shit.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A septuagenarian in a cancer fight. Instead of someone who can inspire people.

Bra. Vo.

I keep thinking they can't be more out of touch, but every time, they come from behind and force me to believe.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they only would lean more conservative 😂

[–] kreskin 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Right? If Harris had gotten someone even more conservative on stage with her than Liz Cheney, maybe she would have won! We need to tack hard right, maybe to the right of trump in order to win.

/s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

I mean if she did pivot and become trumps vp the d would win right right? Lol

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think it may be time for a new leftist party.

[–] baronvonj 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There already exist leftist parties. They languish in obscurity thanks to our election process. We didn't get a new right-wing party, we witnesses a determined enough voter base take it over through primaries starting with the Tea Party and culminating with MAGA. We need more leftist candidates and voters showing up in the Democratic primaries to wrest the party away from the old guard.

[–] MegaUltraChicken 9 points 1 day ago

This is the most important point alot of my fellow leftists just refuse to accept. Because of the way our elections are structured, the only way for us to gain real electoral power is by capturing the Democratic Party and its voters. Getting success with a 3rd party is exponentially more difficult than running up the scoreboard during the primaries, even with DNC fuckery.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Ive been feeling that lately, that MAGA is just the tea party. I didn't put it together until I saw a sign advertising a local tea party organization though

[–] return2ozma 1 points 1 day ago

Been saying it.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yet more evidence I am not a Democrat. I wish I didn’t have to be in this party just to try to influence it in primaries.

[–] SeriousMite 5 points 1 day ago

I really do think they are just controlled opposition at this point. The sooner we realize that, and that electoral politics are not going to be our way out of this the better.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You can't influence it in primaries. If the results don't fit the predetermined narrative then the DNC will simply ignore them.

[–] MegaUltraChicken 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Examples of the DNC ”ignoring” primary votes?

[–] kreskin 2 points 16 hours ago

Examples of the DNC ”ignoring” primary votes?

They flat out zeroed out new Hampshires right to participate in the primary didnt they? So they can clearly pick and choose which votes they count and make up the rules as they go. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/new-hampshire-attorney-general-accuses-dnc-voter-suppression-rcna132945

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 18 hours ago

No, you didn't.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago

well after Pelosi torpedoed AOC there's little surprise. That person is dead set against progressives tanking them at every opportunity. She is made of steel and were effective in some things that were net positive but she's wielding too much power with Democrats and is virtually unchecked.

[–] demizerone 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Democratic party has too many geezers.

[–] kreskin 1 points 16 hours ago

and too many do-nothing corrupt centrists.

[–] leadore 2 points 1 day ago