The lead picture has got to be a wrap or intentional rusting.
Hacker News
RSS Feed of HackerNews
You're correct. A comment in the hn link linked to a forum post. Here's the actual damage:
https://www.cybertruckownersclub.com/forum/attachments/img_3663-jpeg.74370/
you have to be kidding. I've gotten worse on my car from... literally nothing. I don't even know where it came from, but I guess that's why I always buy used lol
I think I've seen that before. Wonder if it's the same truck or if it's happened to multiple people. I imagine similar people buy cybertrucks as bought Hummers, and many of those were also advertising.
It's completely unrelated to the forum post that they're reporting on. The actual story is some minor discoloration under where advertising magnets were placed.
Exactly. Is it AI? This is fake "journalism" for clicks.
“I had the same issue with a magnet on my Cybertruck, which is disappointing because of all the possibilities. But oh well. I wonder if we could place something between the magnet and steel that would allow it to stick but not allow corrosion.”
Toner, paint, topcoat is the answer lmfao
Is there a specific strength of magnet to use and/or a specific spot to place the magnet to that would be easy to access and hard for the owner to notice? I'm just asking for purely scientific purposes.
Well it's fucked up and don't do it, but I imagine a dusting of magnetized iron filings would work great.
Nah, after reading the article it sounds like the corrosion was probably caused by the large advertising magnet getting moisture trapped under it.
Also, don't use the oven cleaner that is already available at at grocery store.
Wondering about a light dusting of toner film or powder...
This is a non story. Dude got some cheap large fridge-style magnets for marketing, and they left a bit of residue.
Them being magnets has nothing to do with what happened, and the damage is not nearly as bad as pictures in the lead image.
If the Cybertruck wasn’t such a grocery hauler, I don’t think anybody would even notice this.
I had no expectations going into this comment section.
Yet, lo and behold, I am disappointed to learn the existence of "cybertruckownersclub".
Had to hunt down the original forum thread after seeing this story posted a few weeks ago.
I think it's pretty obvious why none of the news outlets covering this are including the original photo. Even this article embeds an 8 minute video of a dude talking about it without embedding the original pic.
There's an owners club for nearly every make and model of vehicle on the road. Did you just crawl out of a cave?
Are you gate keeping my disappointment?
Hey! Caves are cheap and comfy!
So if the Tesla "truck" is made of martensitic stainless steel, one could use a strong current running through it to turn the car into one giant magnet?
Now that would be a fun thing. They could use those things to clean up metal trash from the highway.
How shitty is the stainless steel that allows a fucking magnet to stick to it to begin with?
There are different types and grades of stainless steel for different purposes. Generally speaking though, magnetic stainless steel will rust more easily than non-magnetic.
Yep. 17-4 stainless steel (which is magnetic and is fairly widely used) is just as corrosion resistant as 304 stainless while also being stronger and hardenable. It's not as resistant as things like 316 (non-magnetic, the gold standard for low cost, low strength corrosion resistance), 2205 Duplex (magnetic, more expensive, more resistant, stronger than 316), or Cronidur 30 (magnetic, fairly exotic, ridiculouly strong and corrosion resistant in many environments), but it's pretty good.
I've no idea if this is what the stupid truck is using, but there are some pretty damn good magnetic stainless steels out there.
EDIT: They're using 301 stainless steel. It's not magnetic under normal circumstances, but becomes magnetic when cold worked. It is not a very corrosion resistant stainless lol. Motherfucker should have used 316 (or better yet, 316L) like the DeLorean did.
EDIT: I dunno if the DeLorean actually used 316. There's a lot of conflicting information out there. I am now giving up.
Now it looks good
Unironically looks cooler in the article photo lol
Photo is fake or something, the damage caused looks nothing like the thumbnail and front page pic this article is using. Dishonest journalism. You have to click a link within the article to see the actual pictures. Or a few lovely people have posted it in these comments.
Yeah the actual damage was basically nothing. It says more about the dumb owner and less about the actual vehicle.