this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
117 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19222 readers
2368 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former FBI officials are warning that Donald Trump’s nominee for FBI director, Kash Patel, could wield unchecked power if confirmed.

Patel, a Trump loyalist with no FBI experience, has called for shutting down FBI headquarters and creating an “enemies list” for retribution.

Critics, including former FBI assistant director Frank Figliuzzi, express concern over Patel’s potential to politicize investigations, manipulate background checks, and prioritize partisan agendas over national security.

Patel’s nomination, likely supported by Senate Republicans, raises fears of the FBI becoming subservient to the Trump administration.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So FBI directors wield unchecked power already?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago

But they pinky promise not to use it. He doesn't seem to know what a pinky promise is...

[–] Rapidcreek 38 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Too late now. Wray obeying in advance, like the rest of them, screwed you.

[–] fluxion 17 points 3 days ago

So much for those background checks they finally agreed to. Here comes the dumpster fire.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

Yep, it's a broken and fundamentally corrupt system.

[–] snekerpimp 18 points 3 days ago

Thought that was the point, he’s building a regime.

[–] yesman 6 points 3 days ago

What's changed isn't the FBI's power, it's whom it's power is targeting. Important people are in danger of being subjected to the system. And those important people expect me to give one little shit.

Remember, for Patel to match his predecessors' abuse of power it will not be enough to arrest Liz Cheney, he'll have to assassinate her.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

What does that mean? Does the current one have the same power? Headline makes no sense.