this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
821 points (96.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36055 readers
1422 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Maybe I’m just face-blind or being dense but the photos from the scene of the crime look like a different dude than the ginning hostel check in guy. The jackets and backpacks are different. Although people can have multiple jackets and backpacks. We don’t see much of the shooters face but the eyebrows look different. Although, people can pluck/shave eyebrows. I guess the happy hostel guy would have come forward and been like “WTF?” and “I have an alibi” if it wasn’t him?

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I hope it's not the whole gold/blue dress thing all over again.

However, I read in another post one might just be someone they want to question to get to the master assassin.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ultranaut 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If they are the same person they may have two jackets that are very similar but slightly different and two different backpacks. Someone on top of opsec or paranoid having lots of easily changeable looks would make sense. Although ideally you would want different colored jackets. It could also be that the camera quality isn't good enough for the details in the jacket to show up and they only have two backpacks. It does really look like the two pictures on the right could be someone different with a similar jacket to the two pictures on the left though.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Worst opsec agent ever. “My change of clothes will be… essentially the same outfit, but with a black backpack”

[–] Lost_My_Mind 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Have you not watched Archer? You don't know if he'll wear his black tactileneck, or the slightly darker black tactileneck. It comes in both colors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JustZ 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They have over 200 photos already. I think the smiling photos are on a different day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramenshaman 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Pretty sure all of those pics are different people. I guess we'll never find them, might as well give up ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago

Not only do I agree, but also it has been my feeling that the Starbucks footage and visit was a performance of some kind, and the water and phone they found were a distraction. Dude seems to have otherwise thought this through pretty well.

I admit that's nothing more than a hunch though, and I can't really defend it against anyone who disagrees.

[–] feedum_sneedson 13 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Seems pretty obvious the left two and the right two are different people.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

Seems like they'll never find em. Stand down.

[–] LovableSidekick 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

To me it looks like the same person in different lighting conditions.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Honestly one looks like a very famous Podcaster and the other looks like a woman to me

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›