If Mark Zuckerberg can say that Facebook’s ad targeting is not surveillance capitalism, Graber can say that whatever Bluesky ends up doing is not enshittification.
Enshittification
What is enshittification?
The phenomenon of online platforms gradually degrading the quality of their services, often by promoting advertisements and sponsored content, in order to increase profits. (Cory Doctorow, 2022, extracted from Wikitionary) source
The lifecycle of Big Internet
We discuss how predatory big tech platforms live and die by luring people in and then decaying for profit.
Embrace, extend and extinguish
We also discuss how naturally open technologies like the Fediverse can be susceptible to corporate takeovers, rugpulls and subsequent enshittification.
How did we end up in a world where people forgot about lying?
Of course she's gonna say that, it's the easiest way to get new users right now. And, of course, Bluesky will be enshitified. It's inevitable for every service trying to make money.
Honestly disagree. I think it's important to distinguish between companies who make a product or offer a service and charge appropriately for that transaction. Commerce isn't an inherent evil.
Enshittification is inevitable when the customers are no longer the primary method to make money for the executives. That's the perverse incentive that results in actively sabotaging your own business for greater short term profits because you've created a system that doesn't punish you for doing so (typically by running every 'real' competitor into the ground first).
If they are more concerned about stock price, or advertisers or selling data, those are the avenues to enshittification. But selling a service to end users for profit is just normal business.
Blue sky does not primarily make money off its users?
I was responding to this specific statement
It's [enshittification is] inevitable for every service trying to make money.
Ok I get it, I think you are correct and also convinced blue sky must enshittify eventually, but may be years from now
And the scorpion vowed "I'm not going to sting you" to the frog.
It's worse than that - the scorpion might stick to its promise but hops off half-way across to be replaced by a far less amiable scorpion.
I like this analogy. And... yeah, it's true - even if the current owners might vow to not enshittify their platform, they'll likely cash out in the future, and the next owners will do it for them.
Lol they just announced subscriptions so it's already beginning.
Didn't they just get a bunch of money from a blockchain venture capital company? I bet they demand some sort of return on that investment... But how?
She'd be the first to succeed if so.
He is a lady
Thank you. I've corrected my comment.
Not true in general.
The user base already incorporates enshittification. Watching who immediately picked it up was enough of a deterrent for me.
Isn't that the monetization crowd from Twitter?