this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
244 points (95.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43766 readers
1177 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The way I see it that instinct is the cause behind so much suffering and injustice in the world.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a book I read a few years ago named "Tribe: On Homecoming and Belonging" that delvs into this a bit and why humans are so tribal instinctively. Would highly recommend.

https://www.amazon.com/Tribe-Homecoming-Belonging-Sebastian-Junger/dp/1455566381?ref=d6k_applink_bb_dls&dplnkId=2999a0a3-f1d3-4c19-b97a-6215a1e3c695

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The "Us vs. Them" mentality is also called the "in-group bias", in which you tend to align with other members of a perceived group (with little to no logical reason, it can be as simple as belts vs. suspenders). Like many other fallacies or biases, it is a built-in feature of our caveman-brains that no longer benefits us. When used in propaganda, it is often paired with the "strawman fallacy" to build the perception of an enemy that is barely even human.

You can learn to recognize these biases in yourself and in others - This is called critical thinking. I recommend the podcast "You Are Not So Smart" to everyone to get more insight on this subject.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I don't think it's an instinct, because it can absolutely be taught.

I encourage my kids to get along with everyone, but at the same time I can see how some of their peers are taught to be racists and other clique behaviours from home by parents who are just like that and don't even think about it when they pass it on.

But by default, nobody is like that from birth. Babies aren't racists or afraid of different kinds of people. The fear of others is taught.

It will take many generations to change.

[–] Num10ck 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, because it has for thousands of years. Sure, it draws new lines, but then it overcomes them. It's almost like human history is the history of social and political progress.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Bold to assume that it's an instinct and not a taught and learned behavior.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yes and no.

The reason why we form societies this to look after one another, make life easier and safer for us, and find mates.

We have successfully gone from the days where not having kids was a literal death sentence in old age, where a small scratch could easily get infected and kill you, and where starving to death was a frequent occurrence (interestingly enough, your body has all sorts of anti-kill-yourself measures built into your BIOS, such as exercise optimization curves so you don't burn up all your calories exercising (hunting), and starving yourself causes your body to do its damndest to keep as much fat as possible to keep you alive through famines, but I digress).

In some ways, we are at the highest peak of not being tribalistic. But people also invent new ways to create us vs them situations, such as worshiping a gourd vs beating up the shoe worshipers for being blasphemous. You see this often and it's the dumbest shit in the world, lol. Though that particular one skewers it well, haha.

Eventually, I think stuff like race and sexuality will be behind us largely, and it will be the latest minor thing.

[–] foggy 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The late rapper, "Eyedea" of Eyedea & Abilities had a really memorable verse in a song that always comes to mind when I hear this discussed.

Grinding my teeth as I’m peddling uphill / The fight against ape-hood is fate versus free will / We think we've advanced but there's nowhere to go / Mammals stay captive to animal actions / So slowly we climb up this DNA brick wall / Addicted to emptiness, anger and pitfalls / Desire for space, territory, or lust / We'll eventually turn this whole planet to dust

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Outside perspective. Only when we meet another other.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The way I see it that instinct is the cause behind so much suffering and injustice in the world.

That's just what they want you to think.

[–] MaShinKotoKai 2 points 1 year ago

The news feeding propaganda over and over isn't helping.

[–] Hextic 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. That is human nature. In order to overcome that, we would have to evolve into a different species, which I would argue is less appealing than it might sound on the surface.

Instead of trying to overcome it, it makes more sense to build a society that directs that energy in a positive direction.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe a solution could be getting rid of some tribes entirely, so that we're not so divided? We can still have tribes, but we really don't need this many of them

[–] Nutteman 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uhhh are you calling for genny cide ride now my man?

[–] PickTheStick 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nutteman! Hey, Nutteman! Race war? Nutteman! Hey, Nutteman!

[–] Nutteman 2 points 1 year ago

God dammit why did Trevor have to die? Wkuk sketches bum me out now. Still so fucking funny though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This current version of humans? No. But could it ever happen? Absolutely, if we assume our future evolutionary human descendants survive and provided we can supply everyone's needs.

[–] A_A 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes ...and the name will have to change from Homo sapiens to something else.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've heard from other evolutionary biologists that the next gen will be homo sapiens sapiens, and we'll be renamed something else.

[–] A_A 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

interesting ... so I looked it up here :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_taxonomy ...and "homo sapiens sapiens" is not well defined for now at wikipedia - - maybe not the best source I know.

Do I read it correctly that you are an evolutionary biologist ?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No, I just watch content from evolutionary biologists, because it's something I'm interested in.

It may not be that our version of the species will be renamed, but since species delineations are somewhat arbitrary (where does one generation stop and one start, when it's actually a gradual process?), future generations of biologists may decide that we are something else. Either way, we won't be around to know!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe if some mad scientist releases a virus with some CRISPR in it to edit our genes and snip out some of the tribalism drive. Otherwise, I doubt it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think we could if enough effort was put forth into making it happen. The problem is that very same "instinct," or rather the plethora of different experiences and ideals held by individuals seems to make it harder if not impossible to ever come to a global united consensus on anything.

[–] FellowEarthling 2 points 1 year ago

Us ve them is just a convenient cover for me me me, so I doubt it

[–] Toasteh 1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely not without extreme external forces such as genetic engineering, bionics, AI dominance, etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not unless the fundamentals of human psychology change. Forever is a long time to say that won’t happen but certainly not in the foreseeable future.

That doesn’t mean it can’t be worked on or mitigated. But it’s not going away completely.

[–] ThatGuy 1 points 1 year ago

Its natural to pick sides and be against another so nah

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί