socsa

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'll let my partner know that you think they are a fetish. They'll get a kick out of it. If I was you I'd probably find your comment offensive.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, Marx definitely wrote a lot about "western chauvinism." Perhaps you mean "social chauvinism?" Because it's definitely very confusing language for the under studied. Perhaps you should pick up some German language.

Again, I just can't help but be struck by the stark chasm between this liturgical internet "leftism," which seems confused between the principals of pragmatic worker liberation, versus the fantasy that Lenin's autocracy ever achieved anything noteworthy. But I guess populist fan service gets engagement, so who cares about results, right?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (7 children)

I don’t see it as left punching as much as calling out campists and .ml mods. I see it as holding up actual leftist values rather than forming a political philosophy around relitigating the cold war. I have never defended Israel, I have called out the issue with religious fundamentalism in this conflict. I have and will continue to call Israel an apartheid state.

Like I said, MLs literally cannot imagine the existence of political theory after 1924.

Also, my account is at least 5% femboy worship. At least do your homework.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The rule against mild criticism of the admins? It can't be censorship if there are rules, right?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Lmao, thank you mods for proving my point that .ml is heavily censored.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I mean we have seen how the Lemmy devs approach certain topics, and it is definitely not with a preference for openness or free exchange of ideas. There are certain topics here which have a hair trigger for content removal and bans, for extremely petty and minor "transgressions," so the motivation here seems pretty transparent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Based on how ...certain... Lemmy instances have handled themselves, the intention to deal with "Wikipedia content moderation" here is almost certainly not to make a freer version of Wikipedia, but to make heavily censored content enclaves with the same obvious editorial restrictions concerning certain topics you find on certain large instances.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I don't understand. Are you not entertained by fake leftists spouting right wing propaganda in every thread?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Honestly if the RNC had just put its foot down in 2016 and said "no, we will not be associated with Trump because the man is a fucking idiot" they would have eaten the loss in 2016, but would probably be in a much better place electorally now.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Right, the entire point was to make their fake border crisis seem legitimate by placing it in the same rhetorical box as a genocide in Ukraine. And super Saiyan Biden called their bluff like a boss.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because I don't want to spend three days to run a load of laundry.

 
 
view more: next ›