this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
88 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19115 readers
3593 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Vivek Ramaswamy, alongside Elon Musk, plans to push federal workers back to the office full-time, aiming to reduce telework and downsize bureaucracy.

Ramaswamy claims requiring in-office attendance could lead to a 25% reduction in federal staff.

Critics, including federal worker unions, argue many jobs, such as healthcare and law enforcement, don’t qualify for telework and warn the move may hurt recruitment and retention.

Meanwhile, costly underused federal office space has drawn attention, with many agencies utilizing only a fraction of their space.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] negativenull 92 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As always, this is just cover to force people to quit and not give severance. It's a layoff without having to call it a layoff.

[–] chilicheeselies 4 points 11 hours ago

Its not going to work out the way they think it will, because government jobs have a good pension that you dont want to walk away from. This is just going to disrupt peoples lives needlessly and destroy morale.

[–] themeatbridge 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not even a cover, it's the stated intention. They want a reduction in staff.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

25%, literally what they say they want.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Got to appease those shareholders and make the stock go up.

[–] AngryRobot 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I know I'd like to start seeing some dividends (UBI).

[–] Lasherz12 54 points 1 day ago

This is an entire section of Project 2025... Encourage/force career employees in the government to quit so you can replace them with unqualified Sycophants.

[–] sylver_dragon 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

he said. “You don’t even have to talk about you’re in a mass firing, a mass exodus. Just tell them they have to come back five days a week from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.”

Even with a 1 hour lunch, 8am to 6pm would be a 9 hour work day. So, bro is expecting folks to just accept a 45 hour workweek along with a complete return to office. Pretty sure he's going to get his 25% reduction. It's just going to be all of the most talented people saying "fuck that".

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

Which is the project 2025 goal...

[–] affiliate 18 points 1 day ago

no better way to eliminate bureaucracy than by making new rules that everybody has to follow

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Let's do congress first.

[–] ATDA 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If only real estate had some form of value other than using it ourselves.... Hmm

If only we knew of a candidate, perhaps even a president that knew about real estate renting and sales.

Nope let's make people quit and replace them instead!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you're hinting that Trump knows his way around real estate: stop. Trump bankrupted casinos he is so bad with real estate. 6 bankruptcies means he was nothing but a failure.

[–] ATDA 2 points 1 day ago

Haha I know

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are there that many remote government jobs? I checked at the beginning of the Biden administration and all of them required me to be in the office and in *shudder* business casual

[–] chilicheeselies 1 points 11 hours ago

Most are hybrid, my fiance has one. Administrative type stuff that doesnt require you be in the office (like most office jobs), but requires travel. We're worried about this honestly.

[–] BigPotato 1 points 1 day ago

A government building I visit regularly has a help wanted that claims the government is a leader in innovative solutions like telework meanwhile, the workers in that building have to work weekends in the office too!

And, of course, telework is actually is strictly forbidden at my location.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

What a weirdo!!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Oh rama-lama-ding-dong at it again I see.