this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
123 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39020 readers
2311 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 58 points 4 hours ago

Somebody tell Gaetz. That might be one way we get rid of him.

[–] llamatron 38 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"Consent"

Like consent even comes into it

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

If they can consent to extra sprinkles on their ice cream, they can be child sex slaves.

(Edit: I just wanna say I'm so glad I didn't need the /s for people to... Wait, I hope people aren't actually agreeing with this)

[–] Theprogressivist 42 points 4 hours ago

Fucking disgusting

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So does that align with Mohammad 's second wife?

All religion is just a framework to be shitty.

[–] Yawweee877h444 21 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

I dont know why you'd be downvoted, people should be reminded of this often.

The prophet Muhammad married his wife Aisha when she was 6 years old. According to the history he waited until she was 9 to start raping her.

Edit: he was 53 when he started raping his 9 year old wife. Fucking gross.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

I would assume the downvotes are more for the “religion is a framework to be shitty” part. I’m also going to get downvoted for a similar reason.

Religion is justification for one’s moral compass / desires.

You see people who think it’s morally okay to rape kids or take away women’s rights or the rights of trans people or the rights of gay people etc. These people can’t justify morals (or lack thereof) logically so they use religion to give them a false sense of rationality. Hence you think religion is a framework for being shitty.

However, there are other people who use religion to justify “good” behavior like compassion and acceptance. These people are still reliant on fallacious beliefs, but their actions are not “shitty” so they get offended. Furthermore, others—who know people in this second category—may also think the remark about religion being shitty is not correct and is rude. That’s why it’s getting downvoted.

Fun sidenote, we can actually formally prove that religion or at least absolute morality doesn’t matter, and that people will just do what they want no matter what:


Proof. We seek to prove that people do whatever they want regardless of the existence of a god or absolute morality. We have three natural cases:

Case 1: Assume neither god nor an absolute purpose/morality exists. Then a person will default to their own morals. Hence, if neither exists, people will do whatever they want.

Case 2: Assume a god or purpose/morality exists that does not align with a person’s current morals. (For example a god that required you to strangle six puppies every year or required human sacrifice, or raping kids, or blowing up hospitals, or working in finance, etc.). Then this person will not follow that god/purpose because they are a bad god/purpose. Hence, a person will do whatever they feel is right regardless even with the existence of a true deity/purpose when that god/purpose does not share their morals.

Case 3: Assume a true god or purpose does exist and that it aligns with the morality of a person. Then that person will be living that way anyway, so the existence of the god or purpose has no effect on them doing whatever they want.

In each case a person will do whatever they want regardless of the existence or non existence of a god or a true purpose/morality. Q.E.D.


I should note that while I did come up with this proof myself several years ago, I learned later that Marcus Aurelius and other philosophers beat me to the punch by several centuries. But hey philosophy is the study of understanding existence, if we both exist in the same existence we can and should be able to discover the same facts about reality.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Edit, phrasing.

I hate Abrahamic origin religious systems en masse, especially when states use them to justify bullshit. Goes for western countries too.

Some folks probably think I'm targeting

[–] Yawweee877h444 2 points 1 hour ago

I hate Abrahamic origin religious systems en masse

Right there with you in agreement 100%. This iron age mythology superstitious nonsense needs to be eradicated completely, and only studied academically from a sociological perspective for what it really is, myth, as well as all the pain, suffering, death and horror it has caused human beings, and still is causing. Fuck religion.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I quickly googled this and mostly found sources like Fox News or Times of India that follow some agenda.

So here’s a Guardian article on the topic in case anyone was wondering about a commonly known source: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/article/2024/aug/09/proposed-iraqi-law-change-would-legalise-child-say-activists

Basically there are some religious hardliners that are in the pocket of Iran that want to reduce the marriage age to 9 which would effectively end up in legalizing child rape. Opponents of this are being accused of „western decadence“. So basically after the ~~destabilization~~ liberation of Iraq politics are dominated by the same people that run Iran.

The people ~~suffering~~ enjoying their liberation are the normal people as usual.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Opponents of this are being accused of „western decadence“

Those damned gluttons indulging in the luxury of... checks notes... keeping their dicks out of kids.

So basically after the ~~destabilization~~ liberation of Iraq politics are dominated by the same people that run Iran.

I mean, they were ~~destabilized~~ liberated by the same people...

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 hours ago

I'm so glad we brought freedom to that country 👏👏👏

[–] EleventhHour 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Read the headline, immediately checked if this was some the onion type of magazine

[–] EleventhHour 1 points 1 hour ago

Well, it has been that kind of day

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 hours ago

That's grim

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

I mean, some US states have lower... We need to work on it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

It's The Religion of Peace, you see, which in looking the other way, in no way infantilizes the entire culture, which is good, because they're marrying the girl infants away

[–] iAvicenna 0 points 3 hours ago

They probably got Trump's blessing on this one

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing to see here guys. All cultures are equal and thinking the West has a better way is colonialism

/s

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You're acting like plenty of politicians in the West wouldn't do this if they could.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

[citation needed]

State a single mainstream western political movement in which marriage at 9 is not complete insanity

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Age of consent to sex, not marriage.

https://www.ageofconsent.net/world

According to this, it looks like the closest country to this age of consent is Nigeria, at 11.

If you want age of marriage, in the US, looks like four states will let you marry at any age, but require special conditions like parental approval or court approval:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_age_in_the_United_States

California, Utah, Oklahoma, and Mississippi.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Nigeria is not "the West"

Child marriage in the US is rare, in sharp decline and is heavily skewed towards poverty and Native Americans. Numerous political movements exist to raise minimum marriage age to 16-18.

So again, name a mainstream Western political movement where marriage at 9 is not insanity

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Nigeria is not "the West"

I didn't say it was. I'm just indicating wherevthe floor is.