Structurally I know how things should work, but sometimes trying to program it tho...
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
Being confused often by people and not being able to apply yourself to simple intellectual tasks would be good hints but they could also indicate other underlying disorders and atypicalities different from intellect.
This is further exasperated by the fact that most people specialize in one or more brainy tasks such as mechanical visualization, language comprehension (spoken and/or written), rhythm, mathematics, etc.
There are also behavioral differences that are judged as more or less smart depending on the person. For example, is selfish self serving actions smart or stupid? Do we prioritize long term satisfaction or short term? Does a smart person care about betraying trust of others?
TLDR: Idk man, its real hard to tell, dude
I'm a designer. I work with engineers.
I'll stay a designer, lol.
There are many types of cognition. I don't feel I know much more than how pieces move but certainly I look at the board and possibilities. Some of it is spacial modeling and some is a sort of logical progression. That being said people that have particular chess gambits memorized. well that is just memorization. There is also talent and such to consider. That being said when you personally know somone who is good at some particular thing. Its sensible to follow their lead. I know folks who I would take their medical advice above others and others where I trust their economic viewpoints and others for their scientific.
I have been always terrible in maths, and this deficit represent imho a major obstacle in getting a decent job these days.
There is so much I don't know, so when I do know something there's still someone who knows more than me.
No idea, I'm just here to chill with da boyz
I was told smarter people are more likely to be cursed with things that count as mental illness.
I also know how chess pieces move, other than the rare en passant, but will lose to anyone willing to challenge me and I don't think I could get much better than mediocre with any amount of practice. However, I got full marks on a Mensa IQ test so I'd say I'm intellingent in a way but with my mild autism, likely ADHD and lack of practical skills, it's hard to tell. I have done lots of stupid decisions IRL, often repeatedly.
Would I say I'm "smart"? Depends. Intelligent, probably. Wise, hell no.
You have to study strategies, that's how people get good. You won't be a match for anyone read.
[off topic?]
The book 'Starship Troopers' is a lot different from the movie.
In the book the Bugs have space ships and other tech, so it's obvious that their leadership in intelligent. The question is whether the soldiers in the field are thinking for themselves or just genetically programmed to fight.
The narrator opines that if the Bug can kill you, that makes it smarter than you.
Robert A. Heinlein was a fascist.
Do you have any proof?
I remember an epigraph of one his books saying smthg like "To Sergeant whatever who took us as childs and made us men". That's enough for me
So, you have no evidence that he was a Fascist. You have an opinion.
It's very important that you learn that you having an opinion about a fact doesn't change the fact.
Being fascist is expressing fascist ideas, or am I missing something ?
He said that he thought his DI did a good job of teaching him to be a responsible adult.
Look up 'The Bonus Army.' Those guys were all military veterans. They were also some of the most radical people in US history. When they came to Washington they tried to keep discipline like they'd been taught.
If forcing young people to act responsibly is 'fascist,' then every coach, teacher, and sensei is a fascist.
He didn't say that his DI learnt them to be responsible adults, he said he turned them into real men. Isn't playbook fascism ? It's important you learn how to read closely. Words are words, not the opinion you have on them.
So, your evidence is your interpretation of what was a common expression for hundreds of years.
If I bothered to, I'm sure I could find plenty of Left organizations that used exactly the same phrase.
Also, Heinlein wrote "...All You Zombies" about a transman; he had an African woman as a major character in "Tunnel In The Sky"; he predicted a religious dictatorship ruling America in "Revolt In 2100."
And condemning people for a single word or phrase IS directly from the Fascist playbook.
There are very different kinds of "smartness". The currently favored (by most modern societies) kind weighs logical and structured thinking very heavily, that doesnt mean someone "isnt smart" if they dont possess those qualities. Also, chess does not even rely on the commonly referred to "smartness" that much. The most important aspects are long term memory ( for remembering situations from games and acting accordingly)and thousands of hours of practice.
I suck at maths or anything that has to do with numbers. But besides that, so many do say I’m intelligent. Though tbh, I’m far from it lol, there’s so much I need to learn about and the list just keeps building up so I guess it ain’t a bad thing after all. It’s just I’m always willing to open my eyes to new things.