this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
109 points (98.2% liked)

TechTakes

1391 readers
80 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Might as well completely give up on the summary cards from now on

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

Those are the actors who played Duncan Idaho in the David Lynch adaptation and in the two Syfy miniseries. So, yeah, it's not wrong, just incomplete — though I have no idea why it only serves up those three. There's certainly no limitation to three images, as can be verified by searching for "Sherlock Holmes actor" or the like.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago

Maybe Momoa's PR agency forgot to send an appropriate tribute to Alphabet this month.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

Clearly everyone working on google knowledge graph are a bunch of dune movie purists who don't recognize the existence of the 2021 film for being too hollywood.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

I have no idea why it only serves up those three

Dune (2021) was released in 2021, so perhaps he wasn't in enough of the data yet, or some other weirdness like that.

[–] Maalus 2 points 4 days ago

I'd argue you'd expect the newest movie to be more relevant than the older one / the miniseries.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Dune the wrong thing

[–] stardustpathsofglory 28 points 4 days ago

The result is still correct. There are multiple movies, therefore multiple actors which played the role of Duncan. If you are looking for an actor of a specific movie it usually helps to input also the year of the release.

[–] fan0m 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It has been for a while. Never a better time to switch to something different

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Drag took your advice, and it only gave drag the answer drag wanted. It wasn't as good at figuring out which question drag was asking, but it made up for that by not wasting half the screen real estate on other answers. Ecosia beats Google at answering drag's question today.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

sorry, can't let this post go without calling out the greenwashing ecosia that has a chatgpt integration while they only report their own energy stats with a limp "it's too early to tell uwu" when it comes to openai as a provider

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Valid. Drag refused to look at any ads anyways, because fuck ads. Do you have a more ethical suggestion?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Multiple options available depending on what you want. Duckduckgo for Bing results. Startpage for Google and Bing.

I've been quite happy with Startpage for a while now and there are multiple options depending on just how badly you want to avoid Google.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

the other three aren't wrong, it's just an incomplete list.

my ddg default gave me the fictional character's wikipedia article as the top result (it lists all of them and what title they were in).

a vanity fair article praising momoa's work in the 2021 film was second, followed by the dune wiki character page and then imdb's 2021 film page was fourth.

i also have firefox keywords to search the wiki or imdb directly if i choose to, and that's what i would have normally done here.