stardustpathsofglory

joined 5 months ago
[–] stardustpathsofglory 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] stardustpathsofglory 11 points 2 weeks ago

Zeige Dominanz indem du es besser machst als er.

[–] stardustpathsofglory 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Why are you drunk with your bestie?

[–] stardustpathsofglory 7 points 2 weeks ago

And the industrial strengh hair dryer was just too heavy.

[–] stardustpathsofglory 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I still enjoy watching blurays more than anything. The only downside what I see is that it gets more expensive. But otherwise you own something physical that you can also resell.

[–] stardustpathsofglory 2 points 4 weeks ago

Always check for burn in!

[–] stardustpathsofglory 21 points 1 month ago (5 children)
[–] stardustpathsofglory 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The girl also has only one eyebrow. So the only one who does not fit is the left dude who has no eyebrows. He is already sweating, knowing it will be him.

 
 

I am using a Samsung phone and even with all privileges deactivated it creates "stories". This seems illegal. What is your opinion?

I know I should use a different OS than stock or even another phone brand but this is what I currently have.

 

Me: mom can we have linux?

Mom: no, we have linux at home.

at home: Linex Forte

 

I hope questions are allowed here. I am curios if there is a different sort of scientific calendar which does not use the birth of Jesus as a reference like AD and BC. For example Kurzgesagt's calendars use the the current year plus 10000 as this represents the human better or something like that.

Would there be a way to do this more accurately? How could we, in a scientific correct way, define a reference from where we are counting years?

Also I have read about the idea of having 13 months instead of 12 would be "nice" because then we could have a even distributed amount of days per month.

Are there already ideas for this? What would you recommend to read?

 

Tes test

Posting something did not work before. So testing here again.

view more: next ›