this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
80 points (94.4% liked)

News

23376 readers
2959 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Iran’s supreme leader on Saturday threatened Israel and the U.S. with “a crushing response” over attacks on Iran and its allies.

“The enemies, whether the Zionist regime or the United States of America, will definitely receive a crushing response to what they are doing to Iran and the Iranian nation and to the resistance front,” Khamenei said in video released by Iranian state media.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago
[–] SarcasticMan 7 points 2 weeks ago

Ooof daddy stop teasing me, drop trow and whip it out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Their last attack killed a single Palestinian and Israel just destroyed their air defense with planes in response. There is no scenario where Iran comes out ahead in this. Does the Supreme Leader think he has a chance, does he think he has to do this to save face to retain power, or is it just suicidal hatred of Jews and the West?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's because Israel attacked them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Israel attacked Iran, because Iran launched a missile rocket volley at them, because Israel was attacking Iranian proxy forces in Lebanon (Hezbollah), because Hezbollah was firing rockets into north Israeli settlements, because Israel was decimating the Gaza Strip, because Hamas launched an attack last October, because Israel… because Hamas… because… because… because…

In the end, this ‘an eye for an eye’ will leave the world blind.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

an eye for an eye is more restrained than the Israeli response

[–] Zacpod 0 points 2 weeks ago

He thinks he has God on his side.

[–] RangerJosie -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He has a chance because the rest of the ME is waiting for what He does. If this shit goes hot Israel ceases to exist. Attacked from literally every direction. Not a piddling couple retaliatory strikes either. Full bore, fire at will, real fire_everything.gif hours. Israel knows that. So does the US. (The US can't stop this btw. Basically existing as moral support in the region right now.)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

So he's just completely delusional?

[–] T00l_shed 3 points 2 weeks ago

Who could have forseen this!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Upvote for The Castle reference?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I don't get why people are dismissing this.

Unless you've had your head in the sand/up your ass, you might have noticed a global shift in alliances and world powers working with others.

Ie. North Korea and Russia and iran sharing tech and supplies. India and China - same fucking team.

The bombs may not launch from Iran, but fucking stop pretending they and their new friends are not fully capable and willing to cause mass destruction on this continent.

Americans have grown smug. They've never seen war at home. Not truly.

9/11 was amateur hour.

When it comes. And it will.

Feel free to laugh.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Americans have grown smug. They've never seen war at home. Not truly.

Outside of the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812, no adversary in war has ever had the military ability to significantly impact the contiguous US, and while that may well happen one day, it isn't gonna be Iran of 2024 who changes that run.

It's also not likely that any country will have that ability near term outside of a preemptive nuclear strike, and a country set on doing that has to be able to counter or accept the US response, which I don't anticipate any country doing in the near future.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/we-asked-a-military-expert-if-the-whole-world-could-conquer-the-united-states/

More-realistic concerns might be terrorism or economic pressure.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

While I agree with parts of what you said, and disagree with others, can you explain more about how India and China are the same team? Is that a reference to them still buying crude oil from Russia? That seems like a, cheaper prices, let's take advantage. Last I knew they were still having border fights, but maybe that has stopped now. For the good of the innocent civilians forced into those scenarios, I hope it has.