this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
336 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2085 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] foggy 30 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] hypna 11 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Why would this make PBS and NPR sad?

[–] FenrirIII 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because people forget about them or call them boring

[–] UltraMagnus0001 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Supposedly they can't lie either, by law.

[–] Fredselfish -3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Because lately they have been bought and have also moved to the right. It slight but enough for us true progressive to notice.

[–] hypna 15 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think either PBS or NPR has been "bought" by anyone. They're both still non-profits owned by their member stations.

[–] foggy 5 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah that's certainly not what I had meant.

I was just saying they're crying like "hey what about me?"

[–] Maggoty 7 points 3 weeks ago

We need to be turning to non profit, reporter run, news organizations.

[–] cheese_greater 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] tacosplease 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'm down with MeidasTouch. What's the cat for?

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -4 points 4 weeks ago

Mother Jones - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Mother Jones:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that Mother Jones is generally reliable. Almost all editors consider Mother Jones a biased source, so its statements (particularly on political topics) may need to be attributed. Consider whether content from this publication constitutes due weight before citing it in an article.


MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/10/billionaire-owned-news-is-not-our-only-option/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support