this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
1235 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19132 readers
7516 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)

NGL, I had to reread the headline because my brain got too excited.

this sounds better

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Everyone talking about billionaires and how they endorse, support, finance, fund, hold lotteries to influence an election and everyone still thinks they exist in a democracy.

It's an oligarchy or a plutocracy

Call it whatever you want ... but it certainly isn't a democracy

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] BeatTakeshi 13 points 5 days ago

Where are the conspiracy theorists when there is actually something going on? I guess they stand back and stand by...

[–] captainlezbian 13 points 5 days ago

I certainly much hope he has to justify that decision to a jury and later a deity

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago

File this under "why billionaires should not exist".

[–] Brkdncr 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In a 2019 lawsuit, Amazon claimed it lost a $10 billion Pentagon cloud computing contract to Microsoft because Trump used “improper pressure ... “to harm his perceived political enemy” Bezos.

[–] RedditWanderer 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That doesn't really matter. They were just trying to use the system to get more tax cuts and passes.

Kamala wants to raise taxes on the rich 4+%, while Trump wants to lower them by ~1.5% (again). These asshole would want to see Trump harm americans and destroy the system for a few extra % in their pocket.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GuyDudeman 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I saw the first three words of this post and was like, "HOLY SHIT! FINALLY!!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kevindqc 13 points 5 days ago

Loving the 8k+ comments of people cancelling their subscription.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Putin overseeing:

Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg, Trump, The entire GOP.

[–] errer 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Bernie was never more right about the billionaires

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sarmyth 9 points 5 days ago

Oh Jeffrey.... that's not how you're aupposed to run a newspaper.

[–] errer 11 points 5 days ago

Coward is afraid of Trump exacting retribution if he wins. Fucking megacoward.

[–] VantaBrandon 4 points 4 days ago

But just think of the juicy government contracts

[–] homesweethomeMrL 8 points 5 days ago

Nooooooo but there's no record of him donating money to trump's campaign therefore he can't be said to be supporting truuuuuuuump Noooooooooo

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›